Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Dog pound

Sir, — Regarding the Christchurch City Council dog pound, no amount of defensive talking from those upholding the merits of the place denies the fact that despite the area of land available, the resultant building denies sunshine and outlook for the dogs housed there in concrete pens. It is ludicrous that the containing of subsequent noise within high concrete walls was considered paramount in an area comparatively devoid of housing, when the Addington Saleyards have functioned for years in close proximity to housing and city — minus walls. Most dogs are impounded for man’s misdeeds and a number pay with their lives'. How easy it is for those in warm and luxurious offices to dictate their fate, while justifying decisions and actions with hollow-bottomed arguments. Let us face it: the building of this pound was a retrograde and expensive step and indisputable evidence of man’s ineffectiveness in coping with a situation he created. — Yours, etc.,

(MRS) ESTELLE WIN. August 15, 1982.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820819.2.104.3

Bibliographic details

Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20

Word Count
161

Dog pound Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20

Dog pound Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20