Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Parsec

Sir,—lf your reviewer, Ken Strongman, wishes to display erudition, he should make sure of his terminology. In his critique (April 12) of Michael Elphick he referred to “his timing measured to the nearest parsec.” Despite the suffix, the parsec is not derived from the subdivision of the hour, but is based on an angle, i.e. the second of' an arc. It is thus a measure of distance, being the

distance from which the Earth's orbit would subtend an angle of one second of arc, and is approximately 3.26 light years or roughly 3 x 10 million million kilometres. Ken Strongman surely does not suggest that Michael Elphick is so far off course? — Yours, etc., R. L. C. PILGRIM. April 14, 1982.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820417.2.99.9

Bibliographic details

Press, 17 April 1982, Page 14

Word Count
122

Parsec Press, 17 April 1982, Page 14

Parsec Press, 17 April 1982, Page 14