United Council may resist C.C.C. plan
A Christchurch City Council plan to scrap controversial roadworks designations—such as the St Albans expressway corridor—may be opposed by the Canterbury United Council.
“They have simply removed a politically difficult situation from their plate and hoped it would go away,” Cr D. B. Rich, the regional planning committee chairman, said of the city planning decisions. “And they won’t go away.” If the United Council paid more attention to public opinion in one part of the region than to good regional planning, “then we might as well pack up our tents and go away,” he said. Cr Rex Lester said he was surprised by that comment, since elected officials were seen as people with the ability to judge public opinion and act accordingly. The regional planning
director, Mr G. C. Miller, said the regional aim was to maintain a satisfactory level of traffic service on the road ' network. “How that is done is not our concern,” he said. “But the City Council has removed certain alternatives and not replaced them.” He said that appeals would seek assurances that some new traffic solutions would take the place of those being discarded. “These matters of regional significance need to go before the Planning Tribunal,” said Cr Rich. “The people have shown a great disapproval of proposals to realign parts of the region,” said Cr Lester. The committee has recommended that the United Council appeal against City Council decisions on the Avonside/Woodham Expressway designation, the realignment of Cranmer Square and
the commercial zoning of 1 shops in the vicinity of district shopping centres. Action has also been recommended against Ministry of Works and Development road works designations by asking the Government to retain its designations on properties within the city and next to State Highway 1, relating to the St Albans corridor and central city road widening. • If the Government agreed with the City Coucil, that decision whould be appealed by the United Council, the committee said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820209.2.57
Bibliographic details
Press, 9 February 1982, Page 6
Word Count
329United Council may resist C.C.C. plan Press, 9 February 1982, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.