Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Lyttelton ferry

Sir, — Your - editorial (August ll) adopts the sama

negative approach as that of the Manufacturers’ . Association. If “firms have been giving increased preference to the Railways and the Cook Strait ferry” it is because they have no real choice. .The Union Company service is usually only once a week and is more expensive, as is air freight. It is only . railway subsidies which appear to make coastal shipping uncompetitive. A proper study would show that a combined freight and passenger service direct from Lyttelton could easily beat t’.. 3 alternatives for efficiency, cost and appeal. Lack of adequate inter-island transport is the single most inhibiting factor to the development of much South Island industry. The Government subsidises Wellington commuter trains by 60 per cent ($ll million), and could easily justify- a Lyttelton ferry if it was really inter-i ested in serving South Is-i land industry and travellers, It is not doing this with existing subsidised services. — Yours, etc., D. J. O’ROURKE. August 11, 1980.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800813.2.104.6

Bibliographic details

Press, 13 August 1980, Page 16

Word Count
166

Lyttelton ferry Press, 13 August 1980, Page 16

Lyttelton ferry Press, 13 August 1980, Page 16