Website updates are scheduled for Tuesday September 10th from 8:30am to 12:30pm. While this is happening, the site will look a little different and some features may be unavailable.
×
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Huntsbury Spur shed

Sir, — I would support Mr Neeson (August 7). This shed is on a ridge, not. recessed. It is at about 1000 ft cdntour level and may be allowed under the ordinances of the Heathcote County scheme under review. ; My submissions to the as ■' yet incomplete review were that there, should be a total restriction on buildings, espe-

cially urban development, above the 600 ft contour level. I understand the county has ’ finished the hearings of the 900 or so submissions and is publishing its findings. These policies will be subject to appeal if they do not measure up to the demands of the people submitting objections. It is my opinion that the owner got in under the old scheme operative until the new one is promulgated. The new one could very well contain total restriction on buildings of any kind. Surely it would have been possible to erect this shed lower down, close to current development.— Yours, etc., JOHN W. JAMESON, President, Summit Road SocietyAugust 7, 1980.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800811.2.87.12

Bibliographic details

Press, 11 August 1980, Page 16

Word Count
170

Huntsbury Spur shed Press, 11 August 1980, Page 16

Huntsbury Spur shed Press, 11 August 1980, Page 16