Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

‘Doubt’ for disabled

The ... future of ~ disabled people is overshadowed with doubt and frustration, the president of the Canterbury branch of ; the Crippled Children '^Society)-(Mr? 1 -,R-■ R. Taylor)has said in. Christchurch. " .... "? ,The?principlfe‘ that disabled people should- be integrated into all levels of the community seemed to. be generally, supported. but no overall' plan.- existed to ensure, that? this integration''would take place, he said. ' •-. He said there was-a great need'- for carefully'.researched and co-ordinated planning bri what the future-held for 'disabled people, for voluntary as well as State involvement. More than just “lip service” tvas needed to be paid to the integration idea.

. The, Disabled Persons Community Welfare Act (1975) was a big step forward, but it only tackled a small number of issues which affected the disabled and ; their families.-. \ .

. Mr Taylor said that. bringing 1 disabled 1 children into the school system needed definite direction, from the State. ? ??-■•'.

Money) planning, and properly traihed?p6rsonnel were needed ifythe) integration principle is to be more?than just words. “Admittedly-j there, will still need to be; a period for many disabled children when they, must attend a .sheltered ' type of school, but over-all integration is a reasonable expectation for many hundreds of disabled young* people. . i

“A strong lead must be given by the Government as this integration affects all levels of life. Fy learning together, able-bodied. and disabled people will/learn tolive together, and the fear of isolation which faces many disabled people will be removed.” Mr Taylor said. . , Disabled children deserved a great deal more cori'jjjtlefation from State educational .groups if integration was e z ver to? be an accepted fact. ) ,■ ’ " -

“One can’t help- but' wonder how much consideration they will actually get when amendments are being pro-

posed for the Education Act without any reference to disabled children. This is dismal evidence of the Jack of detailed planning.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800331.2.77

Bibliographic details

Press, 31 March 1980, Page 10

Word Count
307

‘Doubt’ for disabled Press, 31 March 1980, Page 10

‘Doubt’ for disabled Press, 31 March 1980, Page 10