Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fluoridation

Sir, — There is no reason why we should have fluoride in our Christchurch city water supply. We have the purest water in New Zealand: let us keep it so. I do not need fluoride, I do not want it, and I jolly well do not want to have to pay for it. To put it in the water and maintain it with about 19 pumping stations is going to be very costly to me as a ratepayer and I object. The rates increased again this year. We can expect at least 15 per cent and upwards increase each year so let the council forget fluoride and fix the footpaths or roads. These come before fluoride surely, for children can have fluoride tablets if desired. — Yours, etc., JACK HOLT. June 14, 1979. Sir, — There are many valid scientific reasons against fluoridation. That anyone should even contemplate introducing such an expensive, wasteful, clumsy, unnecessary scheme at this time of economic disaster, seems to me to be nothing short of lunacy. They must

have been brainwashed. — Yours, etc., J. A. D. ANDERSON. June 14, 1979.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790616.2.99.4

Bibliographic details

Press, 16 June 1979, Page 14

Word Count
183

Fluoridation Press, 16 June 1979, Page 14

Fluoridation Press, 16 June 1979, Page 14