'Jaws 2’ has more gore, terror
By
ARTHUR SPIEGELMAN
NZPA New York Jaws 2“ has opened across the United States, and its makers hope it has a> much box-office bite as it'- phenomenally successful predecessor, seen by 200 million people. •Jaws 2' — just when vou thought it was safe to go back into the water.” the advertisements proBut the critics, sharpening their pencils, say this latest shark film lacks the poise. stvle, and •Jaws.”
These it may certainly charm of the original lack, but — if the reactions of a preview audience are anything to go by — there is plenty of terror and panache left in continuing the gnashings of the killer white shark. One preview audience cheered and shrieked at each bite made by the S2M mechanical shark as it swallowed water-skiers, pimply teen-agers, and even a helicopter before going out in a carefully planned blaze of glorious gore The producers of “Jaws
2” cheerfully admit that terror was their aim in reviving the most successful fish story since Moby Dick. “The aim was to fright en the audience in the movie sense, and what is wrong with that as long as we are not destroying society?” asked the film’s co.-producer, David Brown. In an interview in his New York office as “Jaws 2” was beginning its run m 686 United States cinemas. Mr Brown said: “People come to be scared in the safety of the theatre. As my co-produc-
er, Dick Zanuck, said of the original ‘Jaws' — we want to empty the beaches and fill the theatres.” Asked about the bad reviews that “Jaws 2” was getting from the critics, Mr Brown said there was a tendency to shoot down a movie of this kind because it was clearly commercial: it was made to make money. “If this movie is to be a big hit, and I think it will, it will come because of audience reaction, and our previews showed we are getting that,” he said.
To ensure success for the film, which will open overseas in December, the producers and Universal researched what the public wanted in a sequel. The result is that “Jaws 2” is told from the shark’s point of view, its chief victims being teen-agers, the group thought most likely to want to see the film. The shark is the hunter in the sequel, but it was the hunted in the original. The result is an increase in attack scenes, with more shark’s teeth per minute than the original.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780624.2.216
Bibliographic details
Press, 24 June 1978, Page 24
Word Count
415'Jaws 2’ has more gore, terror Press, 24 June 1978, Page 24
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.