Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Firm defends action

The assistant district superintendent of the Department of Labour (Mr D. Postlethwaite) has told Andrews and Beaven, Ltd. that, as far as the Apprenticeship Act is i concerned, the firm was entitled to lay off a probationany apprentices. The personnel manager of Andrews and Beaven (Mr M. Busby) said this last evening in reply to a report in “The iPress’’ yesterday about "goslow” action by boilermakers at Andrews and Beaven in protest at the redundancy of a probationary apprentice •employed by the company. Andrews and Beaven referred the issue to Mr Postle•thvvaite and he said he had ; informed the secretary of the ! [Canterbury Boilermakers’ Union that the company was > ; entitled to lay off its probationary apprentice yesterIday, Mr Busby said. He said that he understood j that the young man. who had: been made redundant, stilll 1 had the prospect yesterday i of another position. i "This young man had, ini 'our belief, refused at least l I two earlier placements,” he j I said. “We also understand from; Mr Postlethwaite that if his; [position doesn’t eventuate,! jthe Canterbury Boilermakers’! I Union still has the prospect! lof a suitable position for[ •him,” Mr Busby said.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780417.2.63

Bibliographic details

Press, 17 April 1978, Page 7

Word Count
198

Firm defends action Press, 17 April 1978, Page 7

Firm defends action Press, 17 April 1978, Page 7