Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Conviction annulled

PA Wellington; }. The conviction and the penalty imposed on Riccarton trainer D. M. Kerr for a! •(charge of misconduct last (year have been annulled. (’ This announcement was| imade in a release from the ( (secretary-manager of the( (New Zealand Racing Con-( iference, Mr A. R. Algie, yes-' I terday. ( On December 29. 1975, the; (judicial committee of the: (South Canterbury Jockey (Club heard a charge of misiconduct laid against Kerr by (the racecourse inspector, Mr] K. T. F. Samson. The charge was found to! be proved and Kerr fined: $lOO. Kerr appealed against; the decision and this was! heard by a sub-committee of’ the Canterbury’ District I Committee. The finding was upheld, 1 but the fine reduced to $5O. | kerr appealed to the appeal | judges of the Nev,’ Zealand: Racing Conference against; the decision of the district' (committee. One of the grounds of hisappeal was that the district, committee had comprised four members rather than (the three, five or seven as] ‘required under the rules of! racing. - At the hearing before the( appeal judges the appeal was upheld on these grounds, but (the judges held that as the; (district committee had not) been properly constituted.; (the appeal could go on: (further and would have to be. (referred to rhe executive: e committee of the conference.! In al! of tlie circumstances' having regard to the! cl;fact that three hearings had ni already been held, the race-! ‘■course inspector instructed: J his counsel to say to the e( appeal judges and to Kerr i- that he considered that he! ''would not be justified in pro-! .. (ceeding with the matter any! «■ (further. f! In accordance with the decision of the appeal judges a s( sub-committee of the execu-t-tive considered . the balance „as referred to it by the n judges. c j The sub-committee decided that in the circumstances the is i proper course was to uphold the balance of the appeal 4 without requiring the parties "(tn attend any further hear--rjings. The conviction and the 15 ;penalty have been annulled.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19760814.2.164

Bibliographic details

Press, 14 August 1976, Page 19

Word Count
338

Conviction annulled Press, 14 August 1976, Page 19

Conviction annulled Press, 14 August 1976, Page 19