Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Stray dogs

Sir, —We have some strange by-laws. We have had to demolish a bantam house because it was within 10 feet of the boundary, yet 100 ft from the nearest dwelling. Our pet lamb had to go because it was classified as stock. Neither of these pets could roam, soil, or spoil neighbouring or public properties, yet dogs do this every day. Could someone please explain to me why dogs are not classified as stock. On a farm we build stables, cowsheds, and kennels, and the animals are exercised and cared for on the owner’s property. Would it not be more reasonable to disallow the keeping of animals and fowls in flats or on commercial properties or sections of less than a certain size. This would at least cut down the animal population and pollution, in the built-up areas. — Yours, etc., ONE SOLUTION. October 9, 1974.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19741014.2.99.9

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33664, 14 October 1974, Page 16

Word Count
147

Stray dogs Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33664, 14 October 1974, Page 16

Stray dogs Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33664, 14 October 1974, Page 16