LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32563, 24 March 1971, Page 20

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to be considered for this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewritten, otherwise clearly written in ink: and ample margins and space between lines should be left for convenience In sub-editing. <2l A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number are required whether these are to be printed or not (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. <4> The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful is> As a general rule, correspondence on news Items In other publications, or carried on radio and television, Is not acceptable. Anti-racist.—See rules above. R. Taylor.—Subject not open here. John Citizen.—Actionable. And you have not supplied your name. Mrs A. Hulston.—Your “impression” is at variance with the facts. » Sauce for the Goose.—Noone should have been .under any misapprehension about the matter. What Now, Pussycat?—lf you have reasonable questions to ask, well seek answers. But they will need to be more to the point. Practical Man.—lt is not the policy of “the Chancellor” or even of the university, but the policy of the Government—in fact, of successive Governments. Price of Progress (Hornby).— Not "beyond the capabilities of the planners,” but It would be a considerable addition to the rate of (city) ratepayers.