LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32459, 20 November 1970, Page 12

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to bo considered for this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewritten, otherwise clearly written tn Ink; and ample margins and space between lines should be left for convenience in sub-edltlng. (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. Box number are required whether these are to be printed or not (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. <4l The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing; nor does be undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful (51 As a general rule, eorrespon dence on news Items tn otber publications, or carried on radio and television, is not acceptable. Tolerant.—Not our comments; the councillors’. Chas. E. McGlashan.—Too long See rules above. Dick Booth. —Overtaken by events. D. C. McKie.—And the same old incoherent correspondent. Anti-abstract. —No space to discuss modern art. Elderly Resident—You should report the matter to the City Council. A. Bruce.—We are not opening the subject to lay discussion in this- column. Mary Vale.—No space to repeat recent long correspondence on Immigration. Avonside Drive Central.—A common complaint. You could try an appeal to his sense of consideration for his customers.