Professor Fights Legal Follies
Professor W. Barton Leach, Story professor of law at Harvard University, has made “a life-long fight against silly stupid technicalities in law.” Wearing a tomato-red jacket and speaking very firmly, he attracted many interested listeners when he gave an interview at his dinner table in a Christchurch hotel last evening. “I am a specialist in rich nan’s law,” boomed Professor Leach. “Shush,” said his wife. "Blanche is always trying to shush me, but she has been my bride only since January. Sometimes she succeeds and sometimes she doesn't This time she doesn’t,** <aid Pro-
fessor Leach, beaming at his wife. By rich man’s law he meant trusts, wills and the Rule of Perpetuities. “Capitals, please,” said Professor Leach. "Most papers louse that up. Back home I would never be forgiven if you don't use capitals." Professor Leach said these matters were becoming more important, not because more men were becoming richer but because more lawyers were becoming smarter. “And you have some very smart law professors in New Zealand and they are doing a great job in this "eld. “Of course," said Professor Leach, “only a very sophisticated lawyer can really understand all this.” “Shush,” said Mrs Leach. The very narrow field of the Rule of Perpetuities had been his special interest for
35 years, said Professor Leach. “In lectures, law books, and articles I have tried to make the law-makers see sense. “It is quite proper that there should be some limitations on family trusts to prevent huge accumulations of wealth. It is quite wrong that family settlements by wills or trusts should be knocked down by silly, technical, foolish rules. “Several people in New Zealand are with me on this,” said Professor Leach. “Professor Northey in Auckland, Professor Allan in Wellington, and Professor Hamish Gray in Christchurch, plus some in my own country, have got together in a confraternity of anti-foolish-ness." Mrs Leach moved as to intervene. “What the hell. I mean
foolishness anywhere, not just here,” said her husband. “Anglo - American • Dominion-you-name-it foolishness. I started my fight in my home state of Massachusetts and its spread right out here.” The real concern was that the law should carry out its real objectives without destroying whole estates, said Professor Leach. “The rights of widows, children, and grandchildren, which threaten nobody and nothing and which permit people of modest means to provide for their families, could be in peril.” Taxation was only one aspect of the problem. Professor Leach said too much of this kind of law was drawn from the wills of wealthy Englishmen assiduously copied down the ages. The earlier influence of the marriage settlement was often forgotten.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19640320.2.10
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30395, 20 March 1964, Page 1
Word Count
445Professor Fights Legal Follies Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30395, 20 March 1964, Page 1
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.