Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Protection Of Airport

Sir, —With reference to this letter “Protection of Airport,” to my way of thinking, Harewpod airport should be protected. Surely property owners near Harewood are not so smug and self-satis-fied that they have not the time or inclination to give a little thought to the future? Some day they may wake up to the very ftnportant fact that airpoets Wiust be nJ stead of property owners hear Harewood expecting compensation because they jown property there, they should be thankful that they live so near Ha re wood, but in their casual way they just live for the present, and give not a thought for the “past” or the future.—Yours, etc., ELIZABETH McFARLANE. June 5, 1958.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19580607.2.11.10

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28606, 7 June 1958, Page 3

Word Count
118

Protection Of Airport Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28606, 7 June 1958, Page 3

Protection Of Airport Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28606, 7 June 1958, Page 3