Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR HOLLAND AND LOTTERIES

Sir, —One overseas lottery is no more moral than another, and the selling of this country’s goodwill to Tattersails, thus supporting that firm’s dispute with the Tasmanian Labour Government, was questionable, both morally and politically. We have a State lottery masquerading as an art union, with no limit to the number of subscribers, no safeguards against bogus tickets, an inferior proportion of prize money, and large profits to the private promoters. Mr Holland should first ensure that our own lottery meets local demands, and then prohibit support for overseas consultations. New Zealanders dislike fence-sitters, and have suffered a “neither for nor against” policy in gambling for too long. The Prime Minister will find that “both for and against” is an even less palatable slogan.—Yours, etc., VARIAN J. WILSON. October 20, 1955.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19551021.2.14.7

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCII, Issue 27795, 21 October 1955, Page 3

Word Count
135

MR HOLLAND AND LOTTERIES Press, Volume XCII, Issue 27795, 21 October 1955, Page 3

MR HOLLAND AND LOTTERIES Press, Volume XCII, Issue 27795, 21 October 1955, Page 3