Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHAPEL FOR ARTHUR’S PASS

Sir,—ln the report of the Arthur’s Pass National Park Board there was a note of incongruity that a chapel might be built a few feet away from the proposed hotel! This seems a little sardonic and an unfair advantage over the inebriates who might roll from the doors of the hotel into the arms of the church. Yet an undenominational chapel with an altar window facing down the valley to the ranges beyond could be an inspiration, only a little less charming perhaps than the chapels at Franz Josef and Tekapo. But why the insistence on a wholly unnecessary licensed house at Arthur’s Pass? It is a pity that yet another retreat has gone for the remnant of people who love these mountain fastnesses, unspoiled as they are. The granting of the licence was a disservice to Arthur’s Pass.—Yours, etc., A. X. MULLETT. May 14. 1953.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19530515.2.49.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 7

Word Count
150

CHAPEL FOR ARTHUR’S PASS Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 7

CHAPEL FOR ARTHUR’S PASS Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 7