Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LABOUR PARTY AND PEACE

Sir,--As another one of the “misguided, mistaken,” etc., peace advocates, I wish to support the sentiments °L : i Johnson on the attitude of the Officials of the Labour Party ■ concerning so-called collective security, as advocated through the Americandominated United Nations. Some months ago I affirmed that a Re-publican-dominated American Congress would be a grave danger to peace in the Pacific area. That is now an accomplished fact. In the meantime the Anzus Council has been set up. Ttys specifically excludes Britain. The doubts expressed in Parliament by the Opposition are mild compared with those expressed in responsible British journals. As a lifelong member of thp Labour Party, I an ?. appalled at the lack of effective criticism from this quarter. The character of Dulles’s diplomacy differs little in principle from Russia's in Eastern Europe—economic aid, defensive pact, then involvement in war, as in Korea.—Yours, etc., November 11, 1952.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19521113.2.34.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26887, 13 November 1952, Page 6

Word Count
151

LABOUR PARTY AND PEACE Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26887, 13 November 1952, Page 6

LABOUR PARTY AND PEACE Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26887, 13 November 1952, Page 6