ATOMIC WARSHIPS

Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24959, 21 August 1946, Page 5

ATOMIC WARSHIPS

PREDICTION BY U.S. NAVAL EXPERTS WASHINGTON, August 16. United States naval experts predict new types of warships for the future —leng, pencil-like vessels, with knifeedge bows and sterns, and propelled by atomic or jet engines at great speeds c'n and under the water.

The predictions are made by RearAdmiral H. G. Bowen, head of the Navy’s new permanent Office of Naval Research, and members of his staff. Ships of the future will look nothing like present types, says Admiral Bowen. They will have no funnels or islands, and nothing, visible from the outside except a long, smooth body. Submarines will have fishlike tails and be capable of almost indefinite periods of submersion.

He predicted that atomic energy as a means of propulsion will be a reality within five years. The United States Army revealed to-day that it has a new guided missile for defence against fast, high-flying aircraft. The missile, called the Gaps —ground-to-air, pilotless aircraft—is a slim, 10ft long, rocket-powered projectile. When, perfected it is expected to be capable of seeking out and destroying possible enemy weapons before they reach their target.

CONSOLIDATION OF DRAINAGE ACT DISCUSSION BY BOARD “Why has Mr J. T. Watts been referred to over the heads of other members of Parliament?” asked Mr J. E. Jones at last evening’s meeting of the Christchurch Drainage Board when the finance committee reported that arising from a recent conference with parliamentarians, Mr Watts had recommended that, in view of the* multitudinous amendments to the Christchurch District Drainage Act, 1907, the time was ripe for a further consolidation. The committee concurred with the view of Mr Watts, and suggested that the necessary steps be taken. Mr Jones said the board’s office was situated in Christchurch East electorate, represented by Miss M. B. Howard, who had also been a member of the board. The co-operation and assistance necessary would be obtained from the member for the district. The chairman (Mr H. G. Livingstone): That is not the issue. We want the consolidation of the legislation. The report is only information that the committee concurs with the view of Mr Watts; he is only incidental. “Only incidental?” queried Mr Jones “It is rather peculiar that Miss Howard has been a member of this board and should have more knowledge than Mr Watts of the board.” Mr Livingstone: You have a committee. which recommends that the statutes be consolidated. Mr Jones: It is the method I object to —not the principle?' “It was not a question of Mr Watts being consulted—he offered his opinion as a lawyer.” said Mr E. H. S. Hamilton (chairman of the finance committee). ’ Mr Jones: A paid lawyer.