Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPLICATIONS REJECTED

NEW RATES OF PAY FOR CITY

WORKERS

Application was made to the Arbi* tration Court in Christchurch recently for approval of certain industrial agreements that had been entered into between the Christchurch City Council and the New Zealand (except the Northern Industrial District) Engineering and Related Trades Union, the Christchurch Cleaners’, Caretakers, and Lift-attendants’ Union, and the Canterbury Local Bodies* Officers (other than clerical) Union. Having regard to the general purposes of the regulations, declared Mr Justice Tyndall in a judgment issued yesterday, the Court was satisfied that the agreements should not bo approved of in their present form, and the applications were, therefore, declined. . . , , The agreements had provided for many increases in rates of wages to the workers concerned. In some cases the increases were substantial. The proposed rates, in the opinion of the Court, were appreciably in excess, in a number of cases, of the rates prescribed for similar services elsewhere in New Zealand. “It would appear that if the proposed rates were approved,” said his Honour, “there would be some grounds for claims by other parties that anomalies had been created.” The main argument submitted to the Court in support of the applications was that the City Council had decided months ago to give a general all-round increase to the employees as the respective awards and industrial agreements came up for reconsideration. It was stated that certain employees had already received the benefit of that policy, and it was claimed that it would be anomalous if the workers affected by the three industrial agreements concerned were not similarly treated.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19430609.2.51

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXIX, Issue 23969, 9 June 1943, Page 5

Word Count
264

APPLICATIONS REJECTED Press, Volume LXXIX, Issue 23969, 9 June 1943, Page 5

APPLICATIONS REJECTED Press, Volume LXXIX, Issue 23969, 9 June 1943, Page 5