NATIONAL INCOME

Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22336, 25 February 1938, Page 14

NATIONAL INCOME

A Reply To Mr Colin Clark PUBLIC WORKS OUTLAY DEPRECATED [THE PRESS Special Service.] PAHIATUA, February 24. A reply to the views expressed by Mr Colin Clark, the British economist, through the newspapers last week about the national income and taxation in New Zealand, was given by Mr O. C. Mazengarb in an address under the auspices of the National Party last evening. Added interest was given to Mr Clark’s statements from his political associations in Britain. It is recorded In “Who’s Who, 1938,” that he stood in the Labour interest for North Dorset in 1929, Wavertree in 1931, and South Norfolk in 1935, and is a prospective Labour candidate for the last-named electorate. “Only last week,” said Mr Mazengarb, "A Mr Colin Clark, in appraising the policy of our Socialist Government, made these surprising statements: — “ ‘The loss that a decline in overseas values would cause to New Zealand could be offset by maintaining a vigorous public works programme and by maintaining the spending power of the farmers. . . . New Zealand’s national income depended on the maintenance of a public works programme that would eventually give a national return. . . . Any cut-down in public works would cause a stagnation of savings and a reduction in the national income.’ . “What utter nonsense!” continued Mr Mazengarb. “For Mr Clark to claim that our national income depends not on what is produced by the farm and the factories, but on what is spent in public works is to stand the truth upon its head. Public Works Expenditure “We are spending at an unprecedented rate on public works in these prosperous times, but if prices fall and less wealth comes into the country Mr Clark would make a further annual addition to our public works expenditure. That is his way of solving our problems,” added Mr Mazengarb. “Unfortunately for Mr Clark, he has not been in the Dominion long enough to have read the speeches made by Mr Savage and reported in Hansard, or he would have seen that Mr Savage has a different idea of the usage of public works. This is what Mr Savage says on the point:— “’I admit quite frankly that public works are not going to solve the problem of unemployment. In order to solve the problem of unemployment we have to get the people fitted into the industries and services of the country.’ “This .speech showed that the Prime Minister had the right idea, which is diametrically opposed to the propaganda recently broadcast by his department from Mr Clark. It is a great pity that the spending proclivities of his Ministers proven! him from carrying his ideas into effect. Measures Advocated "A lessening of taxation and a relaxation of the grip at present exercised on business interests would encourage a launching out in industry, an increase in- buying power, and a reduction in unemployment. But this is impossible under a Government pledged to a policy of spending the people’s savings and assuming the ownership of all industries.” Mr Mazengarb said that the broadcasting of Mr Clark’s views illustrated the increasing tendency on the part of the Government to allow people from other countries to come over here and take charge of their ideas and affairs. The following resolution was carried, with half-a-dozen dissentients;— “That a pledge be given that we will do all in our power to assist the New Zealand National Party to sweep from office the Government which, by its actions has shown conclusively that it is incapable of sound government, and unworthy of the trust which the country reposed in it two years ago.”