Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BISHOPSCOURT SITE.

°* ™ PfESS. ■;®®'6 I reflect on the proaad • sale of Bishopspurposes, the greatimpropriety of such * e ®» »e. That any.one Writ.- should have had KVhwffro 1 ro " ,cr - v 10 80 f3r ai lA 0 an autocratic JflW «. P ro Posc or even suggest M£|g^,.receive a deputation of [^■Jfo»». ! rt rc ' lmcn ' IC stand!oiili*'rrui • ar P er i Henry Cota ®tudholme, only emto *»>« Church of {&!<* a s P»it of. intolerance :ttxa *ter how great his 1 made certain IpH«V? ?'y * iu for Church iSJitdßrt nt 11 goes as soon as l®^teutu/ arved up ' for 1 ESsffiK V. oan y Church b °<^ 7® l on afl( * sentimental 13$*!? traditions of our past tho spkndid in* - tho pioneers.—

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19260921.2.100.3

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18802, 21 September 1926, Page 11

Word Count
117

THE BISHOPSCOURT SITE. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18802, 21 September 1926, Page 11

THE BISHOPSCOURT SITE. Press, Volume LXII, Issue 18802, 21 September 1926, Page 11