"NOT CO-OPERATION."

Press, Volume LX, Issue 18015, 6 March 1924, Page 10

"NOT CO-OPERATION."

MR r, r (wtcut TO ->J. '^r' publicly stated tt|fc ™y that my son's Public Works permission; wdj *ake lt quite tiea, AS to be associated wftfc-,£§ ewT r 80 01% system P «S*S?2®j of this class can 1* Kit. j_jrj interests of both is the on the Qrougorong) la' 'JHm question as to its went well ia bvtuO officers and by tha Pb£ of the engineer in works department (Mi»\f '\t^i surely proof enough i£ig^j full which the work, 7&flSp9 with the bargain "The metnod Coleridge schema, operation, hnt.fi fi"«^j^am| world WtUCh The principle in essence:" joint stock comply ffiifcSSjffl a co-operative pirtT.^raSH so much ao£ey; wages. The among the variooa men, not in of co-operat"ionf unionism. It my opinion x to operative principle, an<ttam|||lgl and will be fought, "it limriM tions ofthis J'l ana those honourably ' the true ; oerely believe it 1 , fo fa.#M||| whereby peaoa Jn iii> 1 can be mmntaiiio®j^^Sßw penny from stuck to all dit nLameaaKa giyen oitjf interruption which the public inteye|i^B™M® man during months the yorktwHß Moreover, we of our contract MHK organised labour aenMßjP^