Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROTECTION.

TO THE KDITOa. OF "THE TBE3S." Sir,—Re the letter in your paper by W. H. Saxby, in which he advocate Freetrade, I agree with him that Freetrade is the fundamental principle of the great British Empire. There is one question of difference, and that is the unit of value; whether it is three meals a day or only one meal a day, a Chinese basis of value. Now as a Freetrader, how can W. H. Saxby reconcile his Freetrade doctrine with a gold monopoly? That is, we accept a paper currency forced upon us by expediency; notes payable not in the town of issue but somewhere else. Where is the Freetrade he indicates when we have a monopoly in one product—gold? Where is the equality of opportunity or Freetrade which W. H. Saxby advocates? What we do want 13 Freetrade on a true basic wage for all workers, not a value based on one product only.—Yours,, etc., JOHN WELD.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19231206.2.90.1

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LIX, Issue 17939, 6 December 1923, Page 11

Word Count
160

PROTECTION. Press, Volume LIX, Issue 17939, 6 December 1923, Page 11

PROTECTION. Press, Volume LIX, Issue 17939, 6 December 1923, Page 11