Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NURSES IN HOSPITALS.

TO THE KIHTk'.R Of "|HK l lt'/SS.'' Sir, —In speaking at Trinity Hall to the Council of Churches, your reporter has quite misunderstood what I said. ' In speaking of over-woiKod nur-cs, and nf the two who went to bed for a week's I referred to LJuiiland, and to i|vi>:liton in Sussex. 1 do soy again iiiat Hospital Doards. should work i''-t-hi? wards, and then ti.ey would soc tl'o | necessity for "repular weekly ■ days oil' as wo do in district nursing. T am sure the working life of a nurse who holds a responsible position in hospital would be worth preserving. Itcould be done by inereisini; the stnlt and_ the rates. 'I'hat nurses "only get ialr an hour off, and no davs at all," was never thought nf by r.ie. That is ouite erroneous. Kindlv correct this. —Yours, etc., i S. E. MAUDE.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19200522.2.57.1

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LVI, Issue 16841, 22 May 1920, Page 9

Word Count
145

NURSES IN HOSPITALS. Press, Volume LVI, Issue 16841, 22 May 1920, Page 9

NURSES IN HOSPITALS. Press, Volume LVI, Issue 16841, 22 May 1920, Page 9