Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITAIN'S PROTEST.

DIFFERENCE OF OPINION

(Received July Mth, 5.5 p.m.) NEW YORK, July 13. A canvass of the Senate reveals tho fact that a majority favours freedom from tolls for American users of the Panama Canal. Considerable difference of opinion exists in Congress. Somo characterise Britain's interference as meddlesome, others declare it warranted. A consensus of newspaper opinion favours the British attitude. The New York "World" holds that tho Bill violates the Hay-Pauncefoto Treaty.

"Tho Times" says tho United States socks to convert an enterprise of world proportions into a selfish advantage, by discrimination. England's intervention is in our own interests, more truly than in the interests of those for whom England speaks.

The "Herald" says:—"lncapacity and indecision mark tho entire course of tho Administration and Congress." Tho "Tribune" says it is difficult to sco wherein the Bill conflicts with tho Hay-Pauncefoto Treaty. The letter from Mr Knox, Secretary nf State, to the Senate, outlines tho British protest that tho exemption of American shipping 'would be an infraction of the Treaty. In refunding tolls, whilo complying with tho lettor, they would contravene the spirit of tho Treaty. Britain admits that the United States has liberty in regard to subsidised shipping, but holds that thero is a great distinction between a general subsidy and a subsidy calculated upon tho uso made of the Canal by subsidised steamers. Britain believes that it is impossible to frame regulations exempting bona fide coastwise traffic. Other American shipping would benefit, entailing an infraction of tho Treaty.

It is understood that Mr Knox does not regard the protest as a matter for diplomatic treatment. Ho will merely acknowledge leaving the matter in tho hands of Congress.

I. is understood that thoso backing the Bill claim tho right of reimbursing the tolls. European Governments using tho Suez Canal already pay similar subsidies.

Senator Root strongly opposes tho exemption of coasting vessels-

Senator Burton, of the Foreign Relations Committee, considers that tho exemption would be contrary to tho Treaty.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19120715.2.51.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14407, 15 July 1912, Page 7

Word Count
331

BRITAIN'S PROTEST. Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14407, 15 July 1912, Page 7

BRITAIN'S PROTEST. Press, Volume XLVIII, Issue 14407, 15 July 1912, Page 7