ACCOUNTANCY.
Realising the futility of battering one's head against the stone wall of entrenched selfcomplacency, I had intended remaining out of this controversy. But after the evasive whitewashing administered by the local secretary of the Accountants' Society, I feel constrained to say my piece. With reference to the statement that the marking is left to the examiners —what of the scaling of marks which takes fflace ? That the marks are so scaled has been openly admitted by persons of high standing. Further, it is stated that the local instructors are satisfied with the latest papers set. I can assure him that I know several of the most prominent instructors in thi* country and they make no secret of the fact that the papers have 'l>een grossly unfair, and. further, ulisurdly marked over a long jveriod of time. Further, tlie standard (if such an evasive thing can be called a standard) lias been progressively stiffened. Why not to solve the difficulty let. the common herd, after, of course, the wearers of the "old school tie"' have been admitted, ballot for the remaining admissions? UNQUALIFIED BY ONE. Will Mr. Elliffe answer my three questions in your issue of the 25tli inst.? PRACTISING ACCOUNTANT.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19381128.2.42.4
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LXIX, Issue 281, 28 November 1938, Page 6
Word Count
201ACCOUNTANCY. Auckland Star, Volume LXIX, Issue 281, 28 November 1938, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.