JUDGES COMMENT.
SUPREME COURT PRACTICE. | Comment was marie by liis Honor Mr. .Justice Kccri in tlx l Supreme ( unit tills moriiinv on tlie fact tliat in a pet it ion for divorce an a fliria \it in the case was marie hy counsel cnjra;:cri in the lica rin jf. "This U against a rule of Ilie Court which ha - been in force for ttome time,'' stated hi* Honor. "Although it does not matter much where the ca-e is not contested, the practice mi-jlit easily place the Court in an invidious position in a contested case where Until counsel marie afliriavits. That counsel should not make affidavit* in a case in which he is en<:a»eri is a {rood and wise rule.''
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19380613.2.120
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LXIX, Issue 137, 13 June 1938, Page 9
Word Count
120JUDGES COMMENT. Auckland Star, Volume LXIX, Issue 137, 13 June 1938, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.