Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FAILED TO STAMP.

AH «INTERIM RECEIPT." 1 (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Friday. Decision was reserved by Mr. J. H. Lux ford, S.M., to-day, in a case in which Independent Motor Sales was charged with failing to stamp a receipt. The evidence was to the effect that a receipt for £3 was issued by a girl in the office, but she did not think it needed a stamp, as she regarded it merely as an interim receipt. She knew there was a dispute between the manager and Keith Elford Craig, who had purchased a truck on time payment. The manager had told him he was expected to pay £5 within a day or two, or the truck would be taken back. Mrs. Craig came to the office with £3. The girl did not think the manager would take £3, and she gave a receipt not on the ordinary form. The manager had a receipt ready on the proper form for £5. Both this and the interim receipt were put into Court. The truck had been taken back.

Counsel, supporting a claim that the disputed receipt did not need a stamp, quoted Several Scottish authorities, and referred particularly to 1.0.U.'5. The Magistrate: It is rather surprising to know that they accept 1.0.U.'s in Scotland.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19371113.2.136

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 270, 13 November 1937, Page 16

Word Count
212

FAILED TO STAMP. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 270, 13 November 1937, Page 16

FAILED TO STAMP. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 270, 13 November 1937, Page 16