Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHICH BABY?

a I STRANGE U.S. TANGLE., • • I i DRAMATIC SEQUEL OCCURS, j GIRL CHOOSES HER MOTHER. (From Our Own Correspondent.) SAX FRANCISCO, August 12. The drama and heartbreak of a tragic "baby mixup" which affected the lives of two families 17 years ago was renewed when an attractive young woman —-who was the baby in this Strange tangle —announced that she had become convinced the Courts had awarded her to the wrong family. While the city wondered at the unusual turn of affairs, the families of John Garner and Daniel Pittman conferred over the future of the young woman, known for 17 years as Louise Madeline Pittman, but who has nowdecided that she is Marv Elizabeth Garner. In 1010, at a hospital in Atlanta, two babies —one of whom was named Louise Madeline Pittman, and the other Mary Elizabeth Garner —were born a day apart, and a few days later Mrs. Pittman announced she had been given the wrong baby, protesting that the child she had been given was in .reality the daughter of Mrs. Garner. The babies were exchanged in spite ot the protests of the Garners, who were convinced the baby originally given them was really their own. Steve Johnson, who then was superintendent of the hospital, was a sort of | "umpire" in settling the tangl.:, deciding that Louise Madeline should remain with the Pittmans and Mary Elizabeth with the Garners. Only a few months later the girl known as Mary Elizabeth Garner died of pneumonia. The same day Louise Madeline was severely burned. Mary was buried as Alary Elizabeth Garner. The Garners took Court proceedings to gain custodv of Louise Madeline, but records show that the habeas corpus proceedings were dropped.

The families assert that the late Judge George L. Bell ruled that the girl would 'be permitted to make her own choice when she reached the age of accountability. Years passed, and the Pittmans moved to Florida. There a j neighbour told Louise of her uncertain parentage. "Since that time," Louise now | said, "I have felt I was not a Pittman." j At the beginning of August she went to Macon to visit the Garners, and later I made the startling announcement that she had become convinced that she had been awarded to the wrong family. "It is a queer feeling," she asserted, "to have to decide which family you belong to, but I have known all along since I have been with them this was , my family. I wanted to wait a few days , to decide definitely." I Then, putting her arm around Mrs. ! Garner, she said: "I know this is my j mother. I cannot tell you how I know ; it, but I do know it." j "My child is back," Mrs. Garnar ,! ecstatically cried. "I have all my girls I with me now." | The Garners and the Pittmans then 1 i talked it over, aiifl decided to allow the r girl to choose for herself, but she later stated that she would occasionally visit the Pittman family, as she owed it to ' | herself not to forsake that family in s I which she was so closely connected ' ! through the years, 'j -

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19360901.2.107

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 206, 1 September 1936, Page 9

Word Count
529

WHICH BABY? Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 206, 1 September 1936, Page 9

WHICH BABY? Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 206, 1 September 1936, Page 9