Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EPSTEIN'S "CHRIST."

Three apologists fot Epstein's work, seem to require an answer. I give it thus: The symbolic language of Isaiah refers not to personal appearance, but to the utter rejection by an intensely nationalistic people of a universal Message of Good Will. Crude and offensive representations, termed "futuristic," would be more correctly described by the term "atavistic." Tlicy resemble the work of cavemen. Repellant pictures of an object warrant criticism of the object itself. Should not an artist live in the thought and atmosphere of his Divine subject before attempting to represent Him? An image is, in dictionary language, a corporeal representation; a statue. My protest remains. EVA P. CATO.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19350507.2.29.6

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 106, 7 May 1935, Page 6

Word Count
111

EPSTEIN'S "CHRIST." Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 106, 7 May 1935, Page 6

EPSTEIN'S "CHRIST." Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 106, 7 May 1935, Page 6