Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAID IT WAS PAINKILLER.

S.M. AGREED IT WAS LIQUOR

(By Telegraph.—Own Correspondent.)

WAIHI, this day.

Charged with a breach of his prohibition order, Charles George, strenuously denied a statement by a constable, that he was under the influence of liquor when accosted. Defendant alleged that a mistake had been made on a previous occasion, that he was under the doctor's orders and that what the constable smelt was painkiller, which he had taken.

Mr. F. W. Platts, S.M., said he agreed with the constable that the defendant was under the influence of liquor when accosted. A fine of 40/ with costs was imposed.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19290618.2.96

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 142, 18 June 1929, Page 8

Word Count
103

SAID IT WAS PAINKILLER. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 142, 18 June 1929, Page 8

SAID IT WAS PAINKILLER. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 142, 18 June 1929, Page 8