Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GUILTY OF NEGLIGENCE.

MAN KILLED AT GREY LYNN.

FRANKHAM FINED £50.

"COURAGE OF YOUR CONVICTIONS."

After a retirement of about an _our< the jury in the trial of Ronald George Frankham. charged with manslaughter, and, further, with negligent driving of a motor car so as to causae the death .of Oscar Swanson. returned a verdict ot , ' not guilty on the manslaughter count and uuiltv with a strong recoinmenda- | , tion to mercy on the .second count. Mr. j _*" Justice Stringer presided. The case for the defence opened after j the luncheon adjournment yesterday. ! The facts set' out that the accused drove a motor car without lights and • without a horn at night, after a dance at j •* l'oint Chevalier. Un the road home he j crashed into four men, killing one of j them. Lengthy evidence was given hy Professor P. W. Burbidge, Professor of 3 Physics at, the Auckland University, Z relative to the degrees of lighting in the vicinity of the accident as taken at night. " Taking everything into consideration, witness was of the opinion that on the night, in question the conditions ntre ■ cxtremelv bad for visibility. Mr. McYeagh said that it was not disputed that when the car left the cabaret at Point Chevalier it had. no lights. ,:. When the car was driven to the cabaret '■> earlier in the evening the lights were _ burning brightly. The first point for consideration was whether or not ihere was negligence on the part of the accused. Negligence meant tbe 'failure •* to take such care as a reasonable man "-« would take under the circumstances. It had been stressed by the Crown that the accused should have left the car at the U cabaret when he found that the lights ,; were not working. It was easy to be wise after such an event, but the accused j was placed in a difficult position. There "• were two respectable young women who « had to be home at a respectable hour, » and there were two young men who acted "3 as only decent young men should, and adopted the only course open to them. X The evidence showed that the occupants A of the ear had exercised great care. All the way from the cabaret they had kept _ a sharp look-out. and were moving very 5 slowly. Up to the critical moment the % accused was doing all he could under 2 the circumstances. Counsel referred to the effect of the flood lights on the vision i of the driver as well as the fact that 4 rain drops on the wind-screen were ** obscuring the line of sight.. .It was.easy ' to say they should have had lights, but, he asked, "was that culpable negligence. Although' there were no lights, everyone 2 In the car was alive to the situation, «• There had been some estimates of dis- _ tanees, but they were only approximate snd that could scarcely be regarded ai , being reliable. w A charge of this kind, continued Mr ** McYeagh, was of an anxious character. It was a charge in which the penalty was a heavy one. The judge was empow - ~-s'-- er ed to impose a sentence of life ioi manslaughter, and five years for negligence. -gence. Mr. Meredith rose at this and pro -tested. > £*' His Honor: It is_not usual to refe: t* to those matters, Mr. McYeagh. Mr. McYeagh: I mean that it is s ,; grave matter that requires grave con , v sideration. ;_; His Honor: But it is not the thing t< •.- re fer to the penalties. 1 gather fron ■. what Mr. Meredith has said that th < charge of manslaughter is not beinj • h> pressed. . S Mr. Meredith: It h» not a gross case *£ Mr. McVeagh concluded by asking tha * the jury give full consideration to thi £ evidence as given. j_; Mr. Meredith said the evidence ol , <- Professor Burbidge had been very inter •j* esting, but it did not assist in th< •-1 slightest. There was no differencf 5 between shadows in Williamson Avenut • S and other streets of the city, and even ?! motorist- must be expected'to meet witl : such things on the road. When th« V', accused elected to drive home without • *£• lights he knew what he was risking I JJ When the accused found that the lights 7, were no good he could have procured a ;] taxi, put the women on a bus, or walked ;it home with them, but there was nc J!J attempt to get to a telephone. The ,' 'IX point was what justified the use of a I $ car without lights. If the weight of J R evidence was against the and ' ■*£ the jury did not find him guilty, they 2 were setting a standard, and it would b« |s open to any motorist to drive, his cai gf without lights. FeS His Honor said the Crown did nof -y* press the charge of manslaughter, and f _ the only question was whether- the x* accused committed a breach of the Act j_ and drove his car in a negligent manner 5; and caused the death of a man. That H he killed the man was beyond all ques- .£ tion, but the whol* case relied on the 2 question whether he was negligent. ■ti ""There have been a great number of ;§j motor car accidents which have resulted •«| in people meeting their death," said •«£ his Honor, "and most of them have been 3 caused through the negligence of the 3 motorists. It is important that juries T sh °nld have £he courage of their convic- ;■ tu>ns and find according to the evidence. You must deal with each case as you find It, and in this ease do you consider that ; | to drive a motiir car through the streets ■ _, of Auckland at" 11.30 o'clock at night | without light, and without a horn is % negligent?" I His Honor said the case depended on I t f* rc .T! t ! nCe J 5 -. Jt Woul d perhaps _-■ be all right to drive without lights in - a country district where there was not j 4 much chance of meeting anyone, but it I j| was a different matter when it came to .' g the city streets. It was obvious that _ there was very little wrong with the ; car as the constable had fixed it within a few seconds. The very fact that the - occupants of the car considered it neees•j sary to take every precaution was an * indication that they knew it was taking ". a risk to drive as they did. _; The jury retired at 3.50 p.m. and ! & returned before 5 o'clock with a verdict -j as indicated. His Honor imposed a fine of £50 on the accused and suspended.hh license for two years.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19260513.2.126

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 112, 13 May 1926, Page 14

Word Count
1,110

GUILTY OF NEGLIGENCE. Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 112, 13 May 1926, Page 14

GUILTY OF NEGLIGENCE. Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 112, 13 May 1926, Page 14