THE COAL COMMISSION.
SCHEME OF LABOUR. A PROFESSOR EXPLAINS. LONDON, January 15. Professor R. H. Tawney, a leading Labour man and economist, explained the miners proposals to the Coal Commission. He expressed the opinion that the export of coal at present was not effectively organised. This was exposing the industry to less favourable conditions than if there were one single export system. Questioned regarding the proposals for the regulation of wages Professor Tawney said no system of compulsory arbitration was suggested. The miners thought there should be bargaining between representatives of the producers and the consumers, and, if they disagreed, the matter should go to an independent tribunal. The State would have a monopoly of the home trade under nationalisation. Witness said he agreed that if the industry under nationalisation had to pay its way without a subsidy, three alternatives must be contemplated. These were: (1) A reduction of wages; (2) a lengthening of the hours of labour; or (3) a contraction of the industry. The miners maintained their rights to withhold labour under nationalisation. Cross-examined, Professor Tawney said the proposals put forward had not been submitted to a ballot of the miners.— (Reuter.)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19260116.2.59
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 13, 16 January 1926, Page 9
Word Count
194THE COAL COMMISSION. Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 13, 16 January 1926, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.