Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

QUEENSLAND RAILWAY MANAGEMENT.

(To the Editor.) S ! Sir, —May I be permitted to submit j g the following additional facts regarding I g the management of Queensland's rail- I g ways? There is evidently an idea abroad , » that prior to the Labour Government E taking control of the affairs of that ijj State the railways were a paying pro- 1«► position. Such is not the case. For : g over thirty years the anti-Labour party j «» was in control of the government of j g Queensland, including the management g of the railways. For all that period the ! S lailways only shewed a surplus, and | 2 llion a very small one, on three occa- j g siun-. in twenty-seven different years ; g a loss was disclosed. The total loss | g amounted lo £10.000.000. For the last ; g nine years of anti-Labour rule railway ; g cn<ts increased by lt'.'l per cent. For j g I lie nine years of Labour rule the costs $ have increased by SI per cent (this , » inclmles ihe worst of the war period).'© The actual mileage of railways in \ 5 Queensland is ti 17-1. The total number I g of employees is 11i.940. The number of • employees per 100 miles of line is 2SO. g Before the advent of a Labour Govern- g ment the number was 317 per 100 miles, g The average return pqr employee is now " £337, When Labour took control the | £ average return was £246 10/ per I £ employee. I S Perhaps the following comparisons $ may prove of interest. Before Labour 2 c-iiiue into power an engine cost £3000. 1 I Today the cost is up to £13,000. The , 3 cost nf a carriage in 1915 was £1300. ' % To-riay the cost is £2700. Fuel has in- j c . creased in cost by over 00 per cent, S whilst, the following percentages mdi- J ente the wage increases: Engine-driven, ' S iiii per cent: firemen, 87 per cent; ! J guards, o*2 per cent; surfacemen, Kn ]>cr | \ cent. During this same period fares j 1 have increased 121 per cent and freight * only a fraction of the increased cost S (much less than in any other Australian « .State). And let this final comparison < ne remembered, that Queensland's 617-1 J miles of railway serve a population of J 824,(100 (not ' 7. r io,ooo as previously { stated) to this Dominion's 3000 miles for J over one million and a quarter.—l am, j jctc., P. H. HICKEY. J

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19241020.2.139.5

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LV, Issue 249, 20 October 1924, Page 13

Word Count
408

QUEENSLAND RAILWAY MANAGEMENT. Auckland Star, Volume LV, Issue 249, 20 October 1924, Page 13

QUEENSLAND RAILWAY MANAGEMENT. Auckland Star, Volume LV, Issue 249, 20 October 1924, Page 13