CLAIM FOR COMMISSION.
A dispute regarding commission on ! ; the sale of a property came before Mr. , Ii E. C. Cutten, S.M., at the Magistrates' I 1 Court to-day. j Tbe plaintilTs, Messrs. J. B. Thomas!, ! and J. H. Onley, trading , as Thomas and' i ] Co., (Mr. G. J: C. Bennett), sought to ' i \ recover from Brownspn Silk, (Mr. X.! ■ j Prendergaet), £56 5/ alleged to bo duo' '■ as commkeion upon the sale of a prop- { [ crty for £2,350. An alternative claim ! , wae also entered for the eamo amount • ) for breach of contract. Evidence was : given for the plaintiffs that their firm! " had 8010 agency for the sale of defend- " ant's property, No. 2, Laiwry Avenue,! • Parnell. A signed authority wee put in, . which .bore tho words "cole agency." r Plaintiff stated he first knew that tho | , property had been cold by another firm : owing to the fact being advertised. \ c Up to that time the sole ageniry~to sell I had not been revoked. ~ The defence included denial of Jcnowj ledge of having signed authority for a ; sole agency.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19200615.2.52
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LI, Issue 142, 15 June 1920, Page 5
Word Count
178CLAIM FOR COMMISSION. Auckland Star, Volume LI, Issue 142, 15 June 1920, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.