ROYAL HOTEL CASE.
When the Court resumed after in-.], the witness, Henry Temple, went on with hi 3 evidence. He characterised;the cvi-, dence given by Miss arty, a-bk_i__l ■ at the Royal Hotel, as sheer misrepresentation. Witness said he never com- ... plained to her about the conduct of the hotel, nor did he say to her that the '" • hotel was going to the dogs. He did , not discuss Mrs. FleweUyn's figure wita ■ Miss Leharty. "'^.'f^^H (Proceeding.) **' '^lS ________-____——_— ' WltS — >*h.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19100323.2.54
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XLI, Issue 70, 23 March 1910, Page 6
Word Count
78ROYAL HOTEL CASE. Auckland Star, Volume XLI, Issue 70, 23 March 1910, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.