S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLI, Issue 41, 17 February 1910, Page 6

S.M. COURT.

(Before Mr C. C. Kettle, S-M.) " Judgment was given- tor plaintiff ia '4h9 9 following undefended cases:—D.S.C. "T.VJ/jsP< Hamley, W&akapirau, £4 8A and costs 13/; ; - F. Jagusch. v. W. B. Galland, Grejmouth, £8 3AO and costs £1 3/6; D.S.C. v. Wai-i... Ludwig, Paeroa, 12/S and costs 5/; ll}i ! - Geisler t. Arthur Hansen, £T 9/ and cos a i> £1 9/6; A. Cleave and "Co. v. R. 6. Clmrcfl, N«w Plymouth, £8 2/6 and costs £1 3/6; AJ-. Bert Tucker v. H. G. Smith, Fukekobe, £V 13/ and costs 5/; A. Tyer and Co. v. Ai \ Collins, Dargaville, £5 4/6 and costs 8/; ' Herbert Roland v. B. Rosenberg, W«Btport»' £39 11/6 and costs- £2 14/; H. G. Newdicti v. Alicir Colder. Oaeaungu. £1 0/B and costs 5/; W. XL Simmons v. C. Griffith; Khjber Pass, £1 4/6 and costs' 6/; Mrs Kempthome v. Mrs F>. Moron, Kemuera, £3 2/6 and coete 13/; Briscoe atsd Co. v. J. Neilsoo, Te Kiri, £3 18/9 and costs 13/; Dick and Cowden,v. Harold Shepherd, Grej - I/jnn, £1 12/6 and costs c/; P. R. MctiiU v. W. Sellwood. Mangiwai, £13"and costs £1 M/ 6; Mck and Cowden y. William Veart, Great North-road, 18/ and costs' 6/; A. Cleave and Co. v. Walter Freeman, Wellington, £2 Vand costs 10/; Auckland Fresh Pood an 4 Ice Co. t. K. iiitcnell. Pamell, £1-16/2 and costs 6/: T. and S. Mortln V. A. Gunning, Newmarket, £1 3/ and costs 5/; E. G. Clarke v. Mrs S. Williams. Ponsonbx, costs only 11/; E. Parrieh v. P. Dcakin, Eaststreet, £2 and costs 10/; Thomas EUis v. W. Oiliver, railtvav guard, £11 12/ and cost* £1 10/6; Oceanic Fish Co. v. F. W. Klein, Palmerston North, £5 5/ and costs £1 3/6; V. Johansen and Co. v. P. B. Valpj, Waipukarau, £1 SAO and costs 5/: Chandler and Co. t. A. W. Bicknell, Taihape, £3 15/ and costs 10/: CiiandJer and Co. v. Canning and Co., Napier, £7 3/1 and costs £1 3/6; F.,8Knyvett v. T. Cook. Taumarnnul, £16 and costs £1 10/6; Geo. Usher v. J. Stock, Wellington. £29 7/6 and costs £2 14/; D.S.C, r. Fanny Paltry, New Livnn, £2 10/3 and coete DEFENDED CASES. J. Parr v. Mxs J. W. Murray, claim tot £5 10/11 for goods sold and delivered. The defendant said several of the items of the elafin were returned, and, after hearing the evidence, judgment was given for tie plaintiff for the amount claimed, and coets £1 3/6.