S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXIX, Issue 68, 19 March 1908, Page 5

S.M. COURT.

« 4 THIS PAY. Mr District Judge Kettle presided ovee the S.JL Court this morning, and gave the following judgments in unilefended cases: — D.S.C., Ltd., v. J. W. Thomas, judgment for plaintiff by default for .20/ costs; A. J. Eutrican and Co. v. John J. Ewing (llataI>una), costs only, £2 2/; Saiith and Caug-> hey v. William Cairns (Taumiranui), £2 3/1), costs 10/; A. Mai-sack v. Stewvart Litchfleld, £10 10, costs £1 10/6; Kane itnd Robinson v. James Powell, £3 8/, costs 11/; E. J. Hill v. David Elliott Faster, £2 .5/, costs 10/; New Zealand Loan! and Mercantile Agency, Ltd., v. Kennetbi Bayne (Kawhia),

£10 3/9, costs £2 11/6; Blew Zealand Loan and Mercantile Agency, ' Ltd., v. Honeri Wanikau (Tokaann), £2»0, costs £9 6/; W. Thomas v. Charles Hdnry Addison, £% 13/6, costs £1 3/6; Great N&'rtliern Brewery. Ltd., v. Harry Pollock, *1 -.12/, costs S/; G. Richardson and Co. v. Arthur J. Cooper, £12 3/5, costs £1 10/6; Henry Lewis v. H P. Barber, £3 15/, costs 10/; Jessie Tiltsley v. William Hunlan, £1, cipsts of; D. AGray v.~ C. Bryan (Huia), £9-7/8, costs ft S/6; A. B. Donald v. C CrawYrord. £2 2/6, costs 10/; George Clifton v. William Morris, £1 10/, costs 5/; T. O'SheW v. J. W. Brookes, £6, costs £1 4/6; Under Bros. v. Edward Keeley, £4 13/, costs s)'; C. Langham v. Dan Sullivan, £1 14/3; costs 5/; Waitemata County Council v. Mrs Mary Bartlett (Waihi), 9/4, costs 5/.

Verdict for Defendant—Frederick Brown, a Venetian blind maker, sued Maurice Evans, a builder, for £2 18/10, tae price of blinds sold and delivered. Mr Baxter appeared for plaintiff, and Mr J. B. John-

ston lor defendant Evidence was given oa both sides, and the defendant produced evidence to show that the goods were ordered and delivered to aMr Ferra. A' verdict was accordingly given for defendant, with £1 1/ costs.