STRONG LANGUAGE.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 197, 18 August 1906, Page 4

STRONG LANGUAGE.

MAYOR V. COT_^ T C3l_ioit CAMBRIDGE GOU__T CASE. <tßy Telegraph.—Own c<ttmsn_mt am _ > Fr__» In the Police Court to-day «_T__«_ trate heard a case arising but of *]C ough Council scene. Mr. Geo. _ C!«|?" member of the Council, charged Mr* F. Bnckland, the Mayor, with sivß language. Mr. Gillies, of B____-_* appeared for the informant, and ;&__* C. Buckiand defended. Defendant &m_ not guilty. ■ ™ j Evidence was given by Messrs. l_ni j Dickinson, and Brooks. It apptarej tkt (following the Council meeting __ j?* j last Mr. Clark had taken exeeptjo,?? |saley_rds in Victoria-street being p-jj jup before a legal surrender of t__V? was obtained. This led up to a h__t!j conversation in the passage lea__» 2 of the Council Chambers, and ia-iajssi. quence of a remark by Mr. CLHfcjv. : Mayor called him "a K~___fei_: i This language was admitted fesdant, who said it was used •■-__.,-jw. heat of the moment, and was pranu by his conviction that Mr. C__ri.-_-_.fr loyal to the borough Evidence for the defence wa* by deiendant and Messrs. OToeJe ___ Stone. ':

The magistrate said he was inclh»_ fa ■ accept the evidence of tbe town <.«_ __ regard to where the language was __j As to whether the passage-way «~j fc public place ho would defer the point, I As to the language which had _aa_-_'t_| inionrurtion to be laid, he thought ti_t being used in the heat of consequent upon the divided opn_te_ ||. the Council, and in light of the pren_. ing mnnicipal troubles, it wo_li-lK» been better if the case had *&et'"hte_ brought. He expressed the opinion tttt l on the evidence there was n6 ta_«. "■&*.] view was that where there was ho trstk :'. there was no sting. Judgment '***.'_* served. - ? y* : ..