S.M. COURT.—YESTERDAY.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 251, 1 November 1901, Page 2

S.M. COURT.—YESTERDAY.

(Before Mr T. Hutchison, S.M.)

UNDEFENDED CASES,

Judgment was given for plaintiff 5n the following undefended cases: — Kearns, Younghusband and Co. v. Mary Develin, claim £3 15/8, costs 11/; L. D. Nathan and Co." (Mr Campbell) v. T. Brown, claim £10 15/3, costs £2 18/6; Rostgard Bros. (Mr Baxter) v. Catherine Lennan, claim £ 5 6/7 ,co*sts £1 10/6; Hadley and Co. (Mr Devore) v. The Sheet Anchor G.M. Syndicate, claim £9 8/10, judgment for costs only, £1 9/; Arthur 11. Nathan (Mr Baume) v. Thomas J. Hewitson, £3 5/3, costs 10/; W. J. Hurst & Co. (Mr McGregor) v. C. Johnston, claim £3, costs 15/6; Same v. Mrs J. Collinson, claim £8 17/4, costs 23/6; same v. C. H. Drabble, claim £3 15/6, costs 22/; same v. L. Sutton, claim £9 15/, costs 23/6; Auckland City Council v. Walter Nairn, claim £ 1 7/9, costs 5/; L. D. Nathan and Co. (Mr Campbell) v. Cu-rin and Rosandick claim £10, costs 28/6; H. and J. Binsted (Mr Calder) v. F. Mason, claim £2 8/», costs 10/; Dadley and Son (Mr Burton) v. Charles Walker, claim £1 3/6, costs 6/.

DEFENDED CASE.

Wilkinson v. Slator. —In this case William Wilkinson sued James Slator for £4 2/6, cost of printing 850 copies of a pamphlet. Plaintiff stated that he agreed to have the pamphlets ready for delivery prior to the departure of the English mail of August 17. The pamphlets were ready on the day before the departure of the mail, but he refused xo deliver them until the money had been paid. The defence was that there was no stipulation that payment should be made before delivery, and that the final price fixed on was £8. Judgment was entered for plaintiff for the amount claimed with costs 29/.