MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-YES-TERDAY.)
(Before Mr R. S. Bush, S.M.) j.
DEFENDED CASE.
Bradney and Binns v. Captain Herbert. —Claim £7 la, alleged to be due under an arrangement made between plaintiff and defendant thab the former - should tow the Acacia down to the Thames. Ib was stated that defendant had afterwards engaged another boab to do the work. Mr Buddie appeared for the plaintiff and Dr. Laishley for the defendant. The defendant in his evidence stated that the weather was so boisterous that he did nob think the plaintiffs boat was capable of getting them ; away, so be went to the Devonport FerrY Company and arranged with Mr Alison for a tow by the Eagle. A large number of witnesses were examined, but, ultimately, the plain tiffs'were nonßuibed, costs, £5 9s, being allowed defendant. THIS PAY* - . JUDGMENT SUMMONS CARES. A number- of these cases were set down for hearing, but all but one were adjourned. In the case of William Mopagban v. WH<, Ham McElroy, claim £5 14s 6d, the defendant was ordered to pay the amount claimed on or before the 27 th of July.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18940615.2.28
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 142, 15 June 1894, Page 3
Word Count
185MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-YES TERDAY.) Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 142, 15 June 1894, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.