R.M. Court—This Day.

Auckland Star, Volume XVII, Issue 206, 2 September 1886, Page 2

R.M. Court—This Day.

(Before 11. a. Suth Smith, Resident Magistrate.) UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment went by default in the following cases :—T. Inglis v. A. Mosts, claim £15 7s sd; costs £2 7s. — W. K. Franklin v. Wiriiata Mnpera, claim £17 3s; costs £2 2s.—G. Hulnio v. I). Lindsay, claim £3 7 s 3d; costs £t 2s 6d.—A. Yutes v. A. Wood, claim £6; costs £1 17s.— J. K. Luck v. F. Buckworth. claim £10; costs £1 175.—13. l'uttorson v. C. A. Cooper, claim £1 18s; costs l'Js. —H. L. Posseniskie v. M. Sweeny, claim £9 15s; coats, £1 17s. Ordered to pay in instalments of 20s per week.— J. Slator v. James Star.ton, claim £5 ; costs 11s.- E. G. Mace v. J. Moslem, claim £0 6s 3d; costs £1 Is.—Helensvale Timber Co. v. G. It. Cox, claim £1 10s: costs £1 Is Bd.-G. Mcßridc v. G. dimpkins, claim £3 12s; costs £1 ss6d.—H. L. Possoniskie r. J. McKenzio, claim £2 £s : costs £1 is Gd.—C. Bunks v. J. Roberts, claim £29 7s Id; coats£s6s. —Henry Smythc v. 11. X Proeser, claim £ti; costs £116s. JUDGMENT SUMMONS CASES. A. G. Reed v. H. Cooper, claim £22 is 3d. Defendant was ordored to puy 10s in a week. J. Russell v. J. T. Camp, claim £3 Sβ. Defendant was ordered to pny amount claimed on or before the 23rd instant, or in default II clays' hard labour. Henry Smyth v. J. Crawford, claim £4 13s 6d. Defendant was ordered to puy the amount claimed within seven days. G. Winstone v. J. Gilmour. Mr Theo. Cooper appeared on behalf of tho judgment creditor. Defendant was ordered to pay amount claimed, £8 178 within scvpn days. • • • - •-- ••■< c IUIIU £1414s Id. Defendant aid no appeu r and was ordered to pay amount claimed within one week, oi. , in default fourteen days. E. Ellingham v. E. P. Donnelly, claim £! 2s Sd. Mr Theo. Cooper for the plaintiff. Defendant was ordered to pay amount claimed b}- the 3rd of September, or in default six weeks. S. Douglas v. A. Pittar, claim £2 2s 6d Mr Burton appeared for plaintiff, and stuted that tho defendant had consented to pay Is per -weok. Order made accordingly. A. Moore v. J. Paul, claim £1 6s. Mr Burton appeared for the plaintiff, and after examining the defendant, asked the Court to adjourn the case for two months, as the defendant s circumstances were so bad that he could not ask for an order. G. Hodgson v. C. Dickenson, claim £17 19e 4d. Mr Burton appeared for the plaintiff. After listening to tho evidence. His Worship adjourned the case for a fortnight. C. Coatos v. J. Dobson, claim £1 15s. Defendant was ordered to pay amount claimed -within two wcoks, or five days in default. DEFENDED CASES. J. .Icnkinson v. Tonks & Co.—Claim £100.— Mr Ihco. Cooper stated that since Inst Court day the plaintiff had filed his schedule. As this might alter tho position of affairs, tho case was adjourned for ono week Claim for Wages.—T. Pacoy v. C. Dickenson.—Claim £9 195.-Mr Theo. Cooper appeared for the plaintiff, who stated that the amount was principally due for waptes. Judgement wa ultimately givon for the plaintiff of £9 13s Id with costs £i 3s Id.

Juinus Taylor v. O. Dickcmon.— Claim £9 for work done.—Mr Theo. Cooper appeand for toe piainhft'. This was a claim for plasterer's work done for tho defendant. — Tho defendant alleged that the. total aiount he owed iho plaintiff was il Us (id.—Judament wae given for the plaintiff for £8 5s with coata.