RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-This Day.

Auckland Star, Volume V, Issue 1503, 4 December 1874, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.This Day.

"il rt Thoai ; «Beckhß-Q,E 8 a, f E.M.) .jjjjfyie *"' ~ jiiiKS WOODWARD. tow i a fljgis £5 '■»' . ha j,;. jasants purchased s xiiss ;«w* i-jj w hi«h 'i-ed on the voyage d d6feSC-Isiands. from the effects, it was toe" 60 . r ct!f j; On. the other hand witpresafflert, v; •', tf) pro ve that the nfS3 es £* ,»J ; fcbe i r possession for f^thi orevioosly nxA were fine healthy ■ wa? y IVter• riper conveyed the birds from bir'' ,Lt to Mt bomrottv, and he was sure "ft^tS .hot on the way. The *jf\£^endeavoured to settled the accept a nonsuit for plitift who coir'.e.npkted applying for a Bef r trial. , J Waited. Costs £4 335. 6d. ■■BgS&y SAWKJ?:s 't. HENRY PYCROTT. d^. £10 33. 3d, \{t jimes Russell (for i&r Laishley) for pbintiff. Mr Brock for defendant. : Bus-was a claim io? groceries and other g°Mr.' Brock said ha arm • onfess judgment, mi l«s cbsat, « " •>". in poor circum3t*rifl«', 'wa,(- vf&iu S t0 PaJ fialf-a-crown a JJt.Jßnsaell thehght this too small a sum, aait'*oiiH take nearly vg years to pay at that rate ; and it was impossible to say where Mr- JPycfoft in:.;hi. be ;Ano distant period. Mr. Brock 3aid i client had been unzei.hjL for some time, bii h was now in a Government eituftion on the railway, but his salary was not large, Bis.Worsh'tp ■cH^esfced :bat the plaintiff should v.Qt put too much ptassure on, or he Etigit "break i'he CAmel's back," and urge dr/tnciais' into the Bsnkmptcy Court. JMr Sawkins Old t-r ~ wisb to be hard upon lefendsc •:. Judgment was give", for olaintiff, defends_s to pay 4s. a week iDJOUIt?. v:ii CASES. New Seotty'a Kill CJ.M. 00. v. Edward T. Hi'!, calls, £&6& U ; A. Dornwell v. Giles, £}'' deimne ; Thoa. H. Smith v. Benjamin Gflmour, claim £U 13s lOd (to take eviderfce), case pending at Dunedin ; Close Brothers v. Sampson Worsnap, £3 4s lid, jgbods ; John Stewart v. Nelson Ireland, dsim tor work, £J5 12a, The Com t vhr-r- rose.