MONTEREY’S CARGO

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 60, Issue 251, 31 July 1940, Page 3

MONTEREY’S CARGO

REFUSAL TO WORK OVERTIME.

COMMISSIONER’S EXPLANATION.

(Per Press Association'.. WELLINGTON, July :30

Facts elicited by the Waterfront Control Commission in its investigation into the refusal of Auckland watersiders to continue loading the Monterey after 6 p.m. on Saturday, which resulted in cargo being left behind when the ship sailed for Suva, were stated to-day by the chairman of the Commission (Mr R. E. Price) on receipt of a report from Captain IStanich, waterfront controller at Auckland.

Mr Price said the men were engaged to start work at 11 a.m. On the arrival of the Monterey, which had been delayed in the Tasman, the union’s representative and the two wharf superintendents were advised by the company that loading would be completed by 5 p.m., and that there would be no need for extended hours to be worked. During the afternoon a request' was made for the men to work until 6 p.m. to finish loading, and they agreed to do so. At 4.30 p.m. the timekeeper approached the gangs in the big hatches, and asked them to knock off at o p.m. and return at 6 p.m. This the men refused to do.

It appeared to him from the report that if the company had given the order in the forenoon for even one or two of the five gangs to work after 6 p.m. there would have been no difficulty, Mr Price said. Further, had the waterfront controller, or either of the wharf superintendents, been advised that there was a doubt about the men not working late, appropriate arrangements could have been made; but for some reason neither Captain Statnch nor the wharf superintendent were consulted. The company had been insistent that the men would finish about 5 or 6 p.m., and they had not anticipated any necessity for working extended hours.

The reason why notice of intention to work cargo after 6 p.m. on Saturday was required during the forenoon was to enable the men to advise their homes during the lunch hour that they would not be home for tea. It also enabled men who had made prior arrangements for Saturday night to notify the bureau, so that they could bo replaced. In the case of the Monterey, the men had no knowledge, when taey started work in the morning, that they would be required to work extended hours; in fact, they were told tliat they would not be called upon to work such hours.

Mr Price added that the report did not indicate the full circumstances of the loading, and a further report had been • asked for. The rate of loading in two of the hatches appeared to have been slow; but there might have been special reasons. In the other notches the men had done exceptionally good

work, according to the stevedore. In one case overloading of the slings had carried the gear away, with a consequent delay of half an hour. The cargo left on the wharf consisted of 200 sacks of hides and 50 sacks of meat casings.