CREAM SUPPLIES
DAIRY FARMERS’ QUESTIONS. THE MIDLAND COMPANY. • s* MEETING AT GERALDINE. i “We are bringing the suppliers more in touch with the manufacturer, a question which is most important,” said Mr G. Wooding, when introducing Messrs S. P. Taylor, W. H. Staniland, and L. R. Clarke, of the Ashburton Dairy Company, to a. meeting of cream suppliers at Geraldine on Friday evening. The meeting was under tho auspices of the Geraldine branch of tho Now Zealand Farmers’ Union.
Problems affecting both the cream supplier and the manufacturer of huttor were given by Mr L. R. Clarke, manager of the Midland Co-operative Dairy Company (Ashburton). Messrs S. P. Taylor (chairman of directors) and W. H. Staniland (provisional director of the company) also spoke. In extending thanks for the invitation to visit Geraldine and meet suppliers, Mr Taylor said it was good to meet with a view to achieving better understanding of common problems. Any difficulties could bo overcome, he said, if they wore discussed. An important branch, of science was dairy science, said Mr Clarke. On one side of the industry there was the cow and on the other the factory. People sometimes complained, he said, because their tests varied while they claimed to have as good cows as anybody else. However, it mattered not how good the cows, or how high tho test, if something was wrong with the mechanical device, the separator, which came between the cow and the factory. A good deal of responsibility for cream of poor test lay with the separators which were not in order. One common fault after tho third year of the separator’s life was the wearing of the discs, said Mr Clarke. With the shifting of the discs the holes became blocked and the milk missed a number of discs and produced a lower test. When a. separator had worn in this manner quite big variations in tests were common.
Mr Clarke said that some suppliers complained because their tests dropped from 41 at the end of tho season, to perhaps 31 or 32 in a new season. Nature placed tho milk in tho mammary glands of the cow for the use of tho infant calf, and at this time of tho year when the calf was just born tho fat globules were smallei* but there were more of them. A separator, he said, should be adjusted in the spring to meet this, otherwise the cream would not produce tho test it did in the autumn. A quarter of a turn of a screw would make a difference of three to four in tho test, the speaker continued, and a half-turn a difference of six to eight points. Tho cream was then sent for treatment at tho factory, and there was some doubt in the miiids of the suppliers as to why the tests should he low or high. One supplier’s test, Mr Clarke said, had recently dropped from about 54 to 17, and if it dropped much lower it would become milk. Testing was not carried out individually, but in batches of 32 bottles, the speaker went on, and the cream all received tho same treatment. If tests dropped, then tho supplier should sock the reason.
Amalgamation of Factories. All* Clarke claimed that the difficulties of the first year of amalgamation had now been overcome. He said he had received three or four communications because cheques of final bonus payments had not reached suppliers as quickly as possible. The final batch of 300 bonus cheques had been posted on Tuesday last, and some of the staff had gone back on Labour Day to get them away. Suppliers would understand the difficulties of the first year of amalgamation in a factory, which now had 3200 suppliers. A lot of tlieso difficulties would bo overcome in the present year, and it was intended to close the year a month earlier in future, which would enable earlier bonus payments.
Referring to the fact that the balance sheet of the company had not'yet been published, Mr Clarke recalled that it had not been published until December last year because of the amalgamation of the Ashburton and Sou th Canterbury factories. Disorganisation because of this, and because of illness on the staff had caused delay, but the statement was now nearing completion and was sufficiently advanced to give a retrospect of last year. Grading the Cream. In accordance with the guaranteed price, Mr Clarke said Is had been advanced on finest, Hid on first, and 10id on second, during the year, and the average advance was 11.96 d. It could be seen from these figures that the greatest percentage of cream had been graded finest. The factory had paid out 1/2.37d for the season on finest, including the bonus, ‘and the average pay-out on all grades was l/2.335d. Alt’ Clarke continued that the factories had handled 349,000 odd pounds of butter at Ashburton and 556 tons at Timaru, tho cream from South Canterbury during August, September and October being sent to Ashburton lor manufacture. The grading of the company’s product up to November last had boon ordinary, with a maximum grade of 93. From tho end of November, the grade had taken a forward step, and a change in tho weather had assisted in bringing the grade from 94 at both Timaru and Ashburton, with isolated lots at 94.5. The company was aiming at 95 this year, said Air Clarke, because all butter so graded would receive a premium of Is Bcl per pound undci the guaranteed price plan. Costs had shown quite a reduction under amalgamation, said Air Clarke, and worked out at 2.54di per lb. I hoy were handicapped a certain amount, lie said, because there wero two factories and tho whole of their production was not under one roof. A certain amount or the plant taken over had to bo replaced and those costs would not be recurring. According to the forecast by the Alinister of Marketing
(tlio Hon. W. Nash) 1/2.38 was a fair price for an average economically run factory with an overrun of 21.75, Mr Clarke continued, and the average payment of the Midland Company was 1/2.375 or within 1/200 of Id of the Minister’s forecast.
The speaker said that over-run was the determining factor in the payout for the season and proceeded to explain how over-run, the difference in weight between butter-fat supplied and butter produced, came about. He anticipated the day when tbo over-run would be standardised, and said that under the guaranteed price it might be considered that a bonus of 2 3/8 was too much to hold back.
Reviewing the finances of twelve North Island factories, the speaker said that in no case did the over-run exceed 225. In seven cases it was under 22, and in four over 22. The highest payout for these factories was 1/2.1d and the lowest 1/1.83d. The speaker also explained that the company did not receive the 1/2$ a. lb. received wholesale for butter, approximately id a lb. of this going to the Dairy Industry Account. Following on a request made in South Canterbury, Mr Clarke said the Board had remodelled its articles of memorandum so that bonus within 1/4 alb of the maximum paid, could bo paid to the , non-shareholders. Mr Clarke said they had a genuine desiro to give a satisfactory service to suppliers. During the past season matters might not have always been satisfactory as they should because of the need for re-organisation after amalgamation, but these . isolated cases of trouble had been oveevcomc and they could look forward to oven .better results in the coming year. Questions Asked. In reply to a question asked by Mr J. Sharpe, Mr Clarke said that a change in constitution would enable the factory to buy out dry shareholders which would bo done on a basis of 15s on a £1 share, or proportionately on shares not fully paid tip. However, 4 per cent, on paid-up capital was paid to all shareholders. It would be possible to resume only so many of these shares each year, Mr Clarke explained.
: In answer to questions as to why certain suppliers had not received bonus benefits, Mr Clarke said that sometimes tho shares had been taken out in tho name of the supplier’s wife and actually the supplier had no shares. It was difficult to trace these cases because of difference in initials, but if notified tho company would pay out a bonus.
Mr W. H. Davey asked if butter could not be carried out at least twice a -week during summer months. Mr Clarke said that butter day was a nuisance to tho driver. When a driver took longer on his rounds, costs were increased. Mr H. Coulter: “Wo can’t get a cow to work 40 hours a week.” (Laughter). In reply to Mr Sharpe’s question why such things as can brushes could no longer bo supplied Mr Clarke said that if there was a demand for these they would bo spuplied. They had made about £6OO out of sales of accessories in tlio Ashburton area last year. , A questioner said ho wanted to obtain wlieatmeal but a driver had said that it fould not be supplied as they were not allowed to carry it. Mr Clarke and Mr Stanilandl said there was no reason why service in connection with the supply of accessories could not ho continued. When asked if suppliers’ cheques could not bo sent out in the cans to save postage, Mr Clarke said that the importance of the business between suppliers and factory warranted a Id stamp. In reply to Mr R. E. Mcllwtrick, Mr Clarke said that the butter sent to suppliers was finest grade. Tiniaru, lie said had, shown a bigger increase in grading points last year than any other port. Damage to Cans. Asked, who was responsible for the condition in which cans were returnea some of which had been returned damaged, Mr Clarke said that the company was responsible if damage -occurred. He would look into the matter and emphasise the need of more care in handling cans. Mr W. S. Crotty asked if it was true that tho grading had been made easier after the visit of the Minister of Agriculture last year, and, that it had been tightened again this year. Mr Clarke replied that the suggestion was not correct. Any change in grade was probably due to seasonal and climatic differences.
The question of cream collection caused discussion, and Mr Clarke stated that in some cases it was not economic to go long distances specially to pick up small quantities of cream, and some of these trips had to be cut out. It cost .68d per lb, or 5.2 d pei mile, to collect cream. However, there was no. intention of suppliers to bring their cream to main [roads and-roads.
That big suppliers should be given preferential treatment was considered by Mr Clarke to bo a one-sided view. While it was better for the factory to handle large supplies, it would not be economical for the lorries to travel long distances to collect from suppliers only. No supplier Who had a quantity of cream for the company would be turned down. Mr W. H. Davey: Is it not just the thin edge of the wedge and that suppliers will ho asked to take their cream to the main road ? The chairman of directors (Mr S. I . Taylor): Credit them with common sense. / . s ■ Mr W. H. Stani-land said there appeared to be a feeling that some drastic action was contemplated. There was no intention to vary the practice of the past. Asked if more care could bo given with suppliers’ cans, IVlr Taylor said they wanted to give suppliers 100 per cent, efficiency and the staff knew what the company stood for. “We will not stand for suppliers’ cans lieing knocked about,” said Mr Taylor. Asked by Mr W. IS. Crotty if he did not consider a factory with 3200 suppliers too big, Mr Clarke said that the amalgamation would enable greater efficiency and would warrant the introduction of labour-saving plant.
In reply to Mr C. C. Hibbs, who asked what the object of zoning was, Mr Clarke said there were many benefits even if they were not apparent. Under the old cut-throat competition hundreds of pounds had been lost to suppliers. A vote of thanks was carried by acclamation on the motion of Mr W. S. Crotty.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19381031.2.69
Bibliographic details
Ashburton Guardian, Volume 59, Issue 17, 31 October 1938, Page 7
Word Count
2,078CREAM SUPPLIES Ashburton Guardian, Volume 59, Issue 17, 31 October 1938, Page 7
Using This Item
Ashburton Guardian Ltd is the copyright owner for the Ashburton Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Ashburton Guardian Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.