Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOMEN JURORS.

OPINIONS IN CONFLICT. MARSHALL HALL'S DISSATISFACTION. (Per Press Association Copyright.) LONDON, January 28. Four day's divorce proceedings be- i fore a mixed jury culminated m a disagreement for a second time. Sir E. Marshall-Hall, K.C., who was appearing for the wife, the respondent, remarked: "This is my first case before a mixed jury. I hope 1 may never have another." . The foreman stated that ho question had arisen as between men. and women" jurors. Two married jurywomen described listening to letters connected with the case as a terrible ordeal. Two unmarried jurywomen started that the duties should be confined to married women above a certain age. Miss Barker, a juror, who during the war was superintendent of women munition workers at Woolwich, and is now prominent m connection with the women's unemployment movement, considers that women should sit on any case. She says: "It is no use talking of unpleasant details, or of making distinctions between married and unmarried women."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19210131.2.18

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9431, 31 January 1921, Page 5

Word Count
162

WOMEN JURORS. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9431, 31 January 1921, Page 5

WOMEN JURORS. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9431, 31 January 1921, Page 5