The Genus Tigriopus Norman (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in New Zealand with a Description of a New Species
Janet M. Bradford,
By
N.Z. Oceanographic Institute.
[Received by the Editor, March 7, 1967]
Abstract
The genus Tigriopus (Copepoda : Harpacticoida) is recorded in New Zealand splash zone pools and a new species is described from Leigh, Northland. A key to all described species is provided.
Introduction
The genus Tigriopus has been recorded from locations all over the world, but there is only one previous record from New Zealand. McGregor (1965) found Tigriopus in spray zone pools associated with the larvae of the mosquito Opifex fuscus but identified them, probably incorrectly, as (the Mediterranean species T. fulvus.
More recently, the author has received collections of Tigriopus from Macquarie Island, Snares Island, Kaikoura, Island Bay (Wellington) and Leigh (Northland). These have provided further records and material for discussion of T. angulatus Lang as well as revealing the existence of a new species of this genus.
Tigriopus is an abundant inhabitant of splash zone pools and is capable of tolerating a wide range of environmental fluctuations especially in temperature and salinity. This makes it an ideal experimental animal. Its nutrition, the role of growth factors and the effects of external agencies on its sex ratio have been studied and the relevant references noted by Lance, Buzzati-Traverso and Belser (in press). Bozic (1960) has carried out breeding experiments to settle taxonomic problems.
Descriptions
Family HARPAGTICIDAE
“ Body of various forms; slender and compressed, abbreviated, shield-shaped. Single eye present. First antennae of female slender, with eight or nine segments; those of male terminating in a prehensile claw. First pair of swimming legs consisting of a long exopod and a short endopod. Swimming legs with two tri-articulate rami, the outer being the larger. Fifth pair of legs bi-articulate, the proximal segment of the female expanded towards the median line. Ovisac single.” (Lance et al. in press.)
Genus Tigriopus Norman, 1868
“ General form of body similar to Harpacticus. First antenna of the female with nine segments. The outer rami of the second antennae with three segments. Both rami of the first pair of swimming legs tri-articulate. Second segment of the endopod of the second pair of swimming legs of the male terminating in a strong outer spine and inner spine. Exopod of third pair of swimming legs of male similar to exopods of the second and fourth pair; not modified as in Harpacticus.” (Lance et al. in press.)
Tigriopus angulatus Lang, 1933. Text-fig. 1, a-j.
1902. Harpacticus brevicornis: Giesbrecht, P. 36-7, Plate 9 (not O. F. Muller, 1776).
1933. Tigriopus angulatus Lang, P. 1-8, Fig. 1-14.
1934. T. angulatus: Lang, P. 9-10, Fig. 10.
1935. T. angulatus: Brehm, P. 77—9, Fig. 4-6.
1948. T. californicus: Lang, P. 342, Text-fig. 154 (in part Not Baker, 1912).
Localities. Snares Island, Oceanographic Institute Station Number D 140 (collected by E. W. Dawson 13.1.64) ; Kaikoura and Island Bay (Wellington), New Zealand (collected by J. M. Grieve 17.7.64 and 21.6.66 respectively); Macquarie Island (collected by W. Merilees 19.2.67).
Habitat. Marine, in splash zone pools.
Size. Males 1.01-I.lßmm, females 1.03-1.22 mm.
Tigriopus angulatus was described from Macquarie Island by Lang (1933) who later (Lang, 1934) recorded it from Tasmania and Campbell Island and considered it to be synonymous with Giesbrecht’s (1902) Harpacticus brevicornis. On further consideration (Lang, 1948) he equated T. angulatus with T. calif ornicus.
The specimens from Macquarie Island, Snares Island, Kaikoura and Island Bay differ from T. calif ornicus (Baker, 1912) in the proportions of their limbs, especially the first leg in both sexes, and the female fifth legs and in having a total of eight spines and setae on the last segment of the fourth leg exopod instead of seven as in T. calif ornicus.
Figures 1-15 of Lang (1933) and Plate 9 (Figs. 1-14) of Giesbrecht (1902) show the same differences from T. calif ornicus. Lance (who has performed breeding experiments using specimens of Tigriopus from New Zealand) has concluded that T. californicus is distinct from the southwest Pacific species for which the name angulatus should be reinstated (pers. comm.).
Differences are noted between the New Zealand specimens and material from Macquarie Island. The basal segment of the female fifth legs of New Zealand specimens is distinctly longer than wide and extends well past the exopod whereas in Macquarie Island specimens it is wider than long and does not extend past the exopod, agreeing with Fig. 9 of Lang (1933) and Fig. 6, Plate 9, of Giesbrecht (1902). Also, the second basipod segment of the male mandible in the New Zealand specimens has only one distal seta instead of the two drawn by Giesbrecht (1902) and generally found in Macquarie Island specimens.
Lance et al. (in press) distinguish T. angulatus from T. californicus by this characteristic. Even if the number of setae on the second basipod of the mandible is variable there are other, more obvious, differences between the mandibular palps:
SETAE ON THE MANDIBULAR PALPS
T. californicus T. angulatus Exopod Lateral setae 2 1 or 2 Terminal setae 3 2 Endopod Median setae 3 2 Terminal setae 7 5
There appears to be some variation in the spination on the anal segment. Rarely does either sex in New Zealand specimens have spinules on the ventro-distal border of the anal segment. Specimens from Snares Island differ from these in having a row of spinules in this position similar to those found on Macquarie Island specimens and 'figured by Lang (1933).
Brehm’s (1935) record of T. angulatus is unusual in that the animal was found in a freshwater lake at 3,000 feet in the Andes near Santiago. Although Tigriopus is noted for its ability to withstand wide environmental changes especially in salinity and temperature it has elsewhere only been found in marine environments. The animal that Brehm figured and discussed in considerable detail is extraordinarily like the New Zealand specimens even to the proportions of the female fifth legs.
Records of Tigriopus from Kerguelen Islands as Harp actions fulvus by Brady (1875, 1879) and from the Antarctic Peninsula as H. brevicornis by Quidor (1906) were probably T. angulatus. Since they did not figure their material its identity cannot be checked.
It appears that T. angulatus is represented by two forms: a southern form (Macquarie Island and Antarctic Peninsula) with the basal segment of the female’s fifth leg scarcely extending past the exopod, generally with two setae on the second basipod segment of the mandible and spinules on the anal segment ventro-distal border; and a northern form (New Zealand and Santiago) with the basal segment of the female fifth leg extending well past the exopod, one seta on the second basipod segment of the mandible, and no spinules on the anal segment ventro-distal border.
The occurrence of the Snares Island specimens, with spines on the anal segment ventro-distal border and with female fifth legs more like New Zealand specimens than Macquarie Island specimens, suggests that there may be a dine between the northern and southern forms.
Distribution. Tigriopus angulatus has been recorded from New Zealand, Macquarie Island (Lang, 1933), Tasmania and Campbell Island (Lang, 1934) and Snares Island, with likely records from the Antarctic Peninsula (Giesbrecht, 1902; Quidor, 1906), South America (Andes near Santiago) (Brehm, 1935) and possibly Kerguelen Islands (Brady, 1875, 1879) (see Fig. 4).
Tigriopus raki* n.sp. Text-fig. 2, a-j; 3, a-g.
FEMALE
Length: 0.60 mm.
Antenna I: Nine segmented, the penultimate segment very small. The last segment has eight setae.
Antenna II: The basal segment has a large plumose seta, a three-segment exopod with five plumose setae and a patch of bristles. The end segment of the second antenna has three stout spines (the smallest outer one is naked while the other two have one toothed and one plumose edge), four large plumose setae and one small seta. There is a row of bristles along the border of this distal segment below 'the smallest spine.
Mandible: The second basipod has one seta distally; the exopod has six setae; the endopod, three median setae and at least five apical setae.
Maxilliped: The proximal segment has, on the anterior surface, a large seta, an inner row of about 13 very small spines and an outer patch of longer bristles. The distal segment is a hook with at least one basal seta. The basis is ornamented with a few small spines and one plumose seta.
First Leg : On the first endopod segment the plumose seta does not extend much past the spine hook; the bristles on the outer margin are few and confined to the distal part. There are no bristles on the outer margin of the second and third segments. The second basipod segment has a row of small spines distally between the articulation of the exopod and endopod.
Second and Third Legs : The first and second exopod segments carry one internal plumose seta, one large external spine and a row of strong bristles on their outer margins. The third exopod segment has three naked spines, one apical toothed spine and three plumose setae as well as external proximal bristles. The first and second endopod segments have one internal plumose seta and an external row of bristles, while the third segment has three plumose setae, a naked spine on the external distal comer and a row of external bristles.
Fourth Leg: The fourth leg is similar to the second and third legs except that the third exopod segment has one more plumose seta and the second endopod segment has none but instead, a few small spines on its inner margin distally.
Fifth Leg: The basal segment is more than twice as broad as long and has four internal plumose setae, one external naked seta and some bristles. The exopod extends past the basal segment and has five plumose setae. Bristles are found on the internal and external margins of the exopod and there are two rows on the posterior surface.
Sixth I.eg: This limb is represented by two plumose setae and a small bristle.
Furca and Anal Segment: The ventro-distal border of the anal segment is naked. The furca has two large, sparsely spined apical setae, a smaller seta on each distal corner, two jointed setae on the dorsal surface and one small median seta on the outer edge. There are a few bristles on each distal corner; those on the inner comer are on the ventral surface and form a row at the base of the corner seta.
MALE
The male differs from the female in the following parts:
Length: 0.62 mm.
Antenna II: The strong seta and bristles are missing from the basal segment.
First Leg: The end margin of the second basipod segment lacks spines.
Second Leg: The third endopod segment does not reach as far as the extensions of the second segment; it has three setae distally, the outer one of which is strong and spine like.
Third and Fourth Legs: The bristles on the outer margin of the exopod and endopod are longer than in the female, and the spines on the inner margin of the second endopod segments of Leg 4 are more numerous.
Fifth Leg: The basal segment has only one naked external seta while the exopod has one internal naked seta and three plumose setae. The exopod is naked except for a few bristles on its outer surface.
Sixth Leg: This leg is represented by two setae; the inner of these is plumose.
Furca and Anal Segment: There are a few small spines on the ventro-distal border of the anal segment. The furca is like that in the female but has a row of bristles on the ventral surface which are more spine-like than in the female and which extend to the outer of the two large apical setae of the furca.
Holotype. The holotype is deposited in the collection of the N.Z. Oceanographic Institute, Wellington, registered number 36.
Paratypes. Sets of three females and three males have been deposited at the Dominion Museum, Wellington (Catalogue number Cr. 1690); the British Museum (Natural History) Reg. No. B.M. (NH) 1966. 11.30.1; and the Smithsonian Institution (Catalogue number USNM 120022). The remaining 8 paratypes have been deposited in the collection of the N.Z. Oceanographic Institute, Wellington, registered number 33.
Material Examined. All of the type material came from one sample collected by Miss P. Luckens. Description and drawings were made from dissections of three male and three female paratype specimens.
Fifteen specimens of each sex were examined in detail. The average length of 27 females was 0.61 mm and of 27 males, 0.64 mm.
Type Locality. Leigh, north of Auckland, ;at about 36° 30' Son the east coast (Fig. 4).
Habitat. Marine, in splash zone pool,
Tigriopus raki is clearly related to T. minutus Bozic, 1960 in having only four internal setae on the basal segment of the female fifth leg. Parallels are also to be found in the small size and the fact that T. raki was collected in the more subtropical part of New Zealand.
However, Tigriopus raki differs from T. minutus in the following points:
Differences between T. raki and T. minutus
T. raki
T. minutus
Mxp proximal segment, of 13 spinules of 5 spinules internal row of spinules
Male 3rd endopod seg- does not reach the 2nd reaches as far as 2nd ment of 2nd leg endopod seg. exten- endopod extensions. sions.
Setae on basal segment of no inner seta one inner seta male sth leg.
Female sth leg exopod extends past the unde- extends almost as far as veloped basal seg. lobe basal seg. lobe Male 6th leg 2 well-developed setae 3 well-developed setae
KEY TO THE KNOWN SPECIES OF Tigriopus
1. Exopod of sth leg has 5 setae in both male and female 2 Exopod of sth leg has 5 setae in female and 4 setae in male .—.— 3
2. 3rd exopod segment of 4th leg with 7 spines and setae T. californicus and T. japonicus* 3rd exopod segment of 4th leg with 8 spines and setae T. angulatus
3. Basal segment female sth leg with 4 inner setae. Both sexes less than I.omm long 4 Basal segment female sth leg with 5 inner setae. Both sexes greater than I.omm long 5
4. Inner seta on male sth leg present T. minutus Inner seta on male sth leg absent T. raki
5. sth legs with spines and bristles only on the borders T. brevicornis sth legs with bristles also on the surface T. fuhus
Literature Cited
Bozic, 8., 1960. Le genre Tigriopus (Gopepodes Harpacticoides) et ses formes Europeenes; recherches morphologique et experimentales. Archs Zool. exp. gen. 98: 168-269, 21 text-figs., 34 tables.
Brady, G. S., 1875. Note on Entomostraca from Kerguelen’s Land and the south Indian Ocean. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 4(16): 162-3.
lections made in Kerguelen’s Land and Rodriguez during the Transit of Venus expeditions 1874-5. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 168: (extra volume) P. 1-5, Plate XII.
Brehm, V., 1935. Mitteilungen von den Forschungsreisen Prof. Rahms 111. Copepoden aus Galon de Plomo in der Kordillerevon Santiago 3,330 m. Zool. Anz. 112.
Giesbreght, W., 1902. Copepoden. Result du voyage du S.Y. Belgica 1897-99. Zoologie I: 39 pp., 13 plates.
Lange, J. R., Buzzati—Travers o, A. A., and Belser, W. L., in press; The biology and culture of Tigriopus californicus, a marine copepod suitable for experimental genetics. Univ. Calif. Pubis. Zool.
Lang, K., 1933. Zwei neue Brackwasserharpacticiden von den Macquarie iniseln. K. fysiogr. Sdllsk. i Lund Fork. I—l 4, 27 text-figs.
1934: Marine Harpacticiden von der Gampbell-Inseln und einigen anderen sudlich inseln. Acta. Univ. Lund. N.F. Avd 2 Bd 30(14): 1-56, 153 text-figs.
1948: Monographic der Harpacticiden. Hakan Ohlssons Boktryckeri, Lund. 2 vol. 1,682 pp., 610 text-figs., 378 maps, 47 tables.
McGregor, D. D., 1965. Aspects of the biology of Opifex fuscus Hutton (Diptera: Gullicidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. {A) 40(1—3): 9-14, 1 table.
Quidor, A., 1906. Gopepodes. Exped. Antarc. Francaise (1903-5): 20 pp., 3 plates.
* raki = north (Maori language).
* See Lance et al. (in press).
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TRSZOO19671209.2.2
Bibliographic details
Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand : Zoology, Volume 10, Issue 6, 9 December 1967, Page 51
Word Count
2,656The Genus Tigriopus Norman (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in New Zealand with a Description of a New Species Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand : Zoology, Volume 10, Issue 6, 9 December 1967, Page 51
Using This Item
In-Copyright Materials
In-copyright materials are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. This means that you may copy, adapt and republish this material, as long as you attribute both the author and the Royal Society of New Zealand.
In-copyright taxonomic materials are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution No-Derivatives 4.0 International licence. This means that you may copy and republish this material, as long as you attribute both the author and the Royal Society of New Zealand.
For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this periodical, please refer to the Copyright guide.