Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Bohemian Schism

A few weeks ago we had occasion to take note of a letter in the Times of India, which gave a very exaggerated account of the Czecho-Slovak Schism (says The Examiner, Bombay, for June 18). The cuttings then at hand reduced the story to more moderate dimensions, but last mail brought us more exact and later information which whittles the thing down still further till there is very little indeed left of it.

From the Catholic Times, May

The papers both in England and abroad have frequently made mention of the Czecho-Slovak Schism, "the great secession from Rome" and "the terrible disaster to the Catholic Church." The reports vary considerably, and rarely give a full or accurate account of the matter, besides leaving the impression that more satisfaction is found in writing about the "disastrous anti-Catholic movement" than in representing the true state of affairs.

It must be frankly acknowledged that no one knows the exact truth with regard to the number of those who have seceded, since the country is as yet so unsettled, that it is not possible to give quite reliable information.

Some Reliable Figures

Katolichi List, a very well-informed -Yugoslav re view, in its April number, gives the best available figures concerning the apostates in most Czecho-Slovak dioceses. They are as follows:

These numbers regarding churches and priests may be considered reliable. The number of lay-apostates may doubtless be considerably higher, since these dioceses do not represent the whole country. For example, the Ruthcnian Uniates have suffered serious losses and are not even mentioned in the foregoing list.

The Hussite Spirit

But the numbers, though they appear considerable, are not so in reality, if we take all the circumstances into consideration. For anyone acquainted with the country knows that the spirit of the old Hussites, although suppressed by the Austrian police force, did not die out. John Hus, who was condemned by the Church as a heretic, always found a few followers and admirers in that country. These succeeded in representing him as the hero of the nation, condemned not because he was a heretic, but because he was a Czech. However mean and absurd this statement may appear, ,it is to-day a powerful incentive to oppose the Church. When, after the armistice, the new Czecho-Slovak Republic was formed, these old Hussites, led by some few ambitious apostate priests, commenced a dishonorable propaganda against the Church, as the historical enemy of the nation, with the view of nationalising the Bohemian Church.

The Austrian Regime

It is to be remembered that the Czechs are patriots, and decided enemies of Austria, which unfortunately, under 'pretence of Catholicity, often limited the rights of the nation. Thus the national reaction was directed principally against the Catholic Church. Characteristic are the words of the memorandum for the union with the Serbian National (Schismatic) Church, signed by the "Cen-

>VJ,■;■ tral Committee of the Czecho-Slovak Church": "Our !§; ■■',• nation fell under the influence of Rome, which was ever ■;. and everywhere hostile to our national aspirations. It V' was the great priest and martyr, our master John Hus„ £>t of-holy memory, who fought for the moral revival of the ; v ; : nation and its separation from Rome."

The Los von Rom Movement Public opinion was well prepared for the apostasy by the Los von Rom Movement. This Los von Rom Movement was begun and supported chiefly by German Lutherans to pave the way for' apostasy on a big scale. It was notoriously unscrupulous in its methods and did not hesitate to make use of lies and violence. Moreover, the Socialistic movement in Bohemia does not fall far short of Bolshevism in the matter of religion. It is not surprising, then, that' they had little respect for traditions. It was no uncommon thing for a brass band to play on the occasion of an apostate priest's marriage. The Government did not even attempt to disguise their sympathy with the movement, and treated Catholics in a somewhat unfair manner. This, of course, encouraged the excesses and the lawlessness of the populace, a striking example of which were the iconoclastic outrages.

Catholic Surprise and Resistance

The Catholics were at first not a little surprised at such fanaticism and, of course, were not ready for such a campaign, while the apostates were encouraged and supported by almost all the papers of the country. Thus they succeeded in winning over large numbers, particularly of the uneducated, who did not even know the true nature of the question at issue. But the Catholics soon began to organise themselves with remarkable success. A keen observer of the situation wrote a short time ago in Zivot, a Yugoslav review, thus: "Now the Czech Catholics are preparing themselves and waiting for the moment to fight for freedom of religion and the Church. All who remain faithful to Catholic principles form together one united Catholic front. The hardest struggle is the formation of a Catholic press. Yet the new Catholic paper Lid reached in a short time a circulation of 30,000. The leaders of the national Church, Zahradnik and Parsley, lose more and more of their adherents, and the circulation of their paper fell from 15,000 to 3000.

The Schism a Failure

"The schismatic movement, as a whole, is a hopeless failure in every way. The Catholics sincerely regret that so many have been misled, and have reason to complain of the fanaticism of the sectarians and the absence of just protection on the part of the Government. Yet the movement, while inflicting no serious wound on the Church, will serve to purify her by removing the lifeless and withered branches. The eleven and a half million Catholics who remain . faithful will be the stronger and the better once the immediate troubles are over. The schismatic movement is. not likely to have any lasting influence. Dr. Radle, a professor at the University of Prague and a friend of the movement, expressed his disappointment in these words: "A good will is not sufficient for the national Church to overcome Catholicism. There is no need of a clear principle and of a religious programme. For want of such a programme Hussitism succumbed to Catholicism, although it was a stronger movement than that of the new national Church. Catholicism is an idea and a powerful idea, and can only be overthrown by another idea. But where is this new idea in the Czecho-Slovak Church?"

(2) America, April 30, provides some further details of the situation as follows:

"The Czecho-Slovakian National Church has gone the way of all sects and schisms, and is rapidly splitting up into new divisions. A number of the apostates, such as Farsky, are thorough unbelievers, and form one party, while others, with Zahradnik, would create a national Church under the patronage of the State. The Serbian Orthodox Synod, it may be remembered, had been asked to affiliate the new sect to the Serbian Orthodox Church, but in the course of the negotiations the antagonism between the Serbians and Czecho-Slovakians became manifest, the latter refusing to submit to the demands of Orthodoxy, which were against the principles of liberty of conscience and personality." Probably a general congress of parish groups will be convened to decide the future course of what is. quite properly called the "TJnnational Church," since it certainly does not represent the people of the new Republic who remain overwhelmingly Catholic.

Another sign of disruption is the fact that the apostate priests are more and more losing their ascendancy in

the movement, tho control of which is passing into the hands of total unbelievers. The atheistic teachers, especially, have assumed leadership. The last issue of tho Cesky Zapas, the Czech Struggle, expressly states that religious instruction should be left to lay-teachers, instead of being in the hands of "clergymen* who have come from Romish seminaries and are infected with the atmosphere of seminaries."

(3) From America, January 29, we derive the following broader view of the whole situation from the pen of E. Christich:

Catholics, the real brand, are organising with splendid impetus in Czecho-Slovakia.. If law-breakers, scandalizers of society, attract undue attention and set the country in a ferment, it means, after all, that they are the exceptions. The mass of the good and loyal people, the normal Christians in the land, should not be overlooked, while we stare at the antics of the apostates. The revival of religious fervor deserves attention and might serve as a beacon to others. A fillip has been given perhaps to Catholic youth by the evil in view; for the recrudescence of societies to promote religious interests is quite phenomenal. Students of the higher and middle schools are concentrating and extending their unions. General Communions are more frequent and better attended. The seceders and disturbers stand aghast at revelations of deep, ardent belief, and the determined stand for religious liberty. Angry crowds hinder the distribution of agnostic and anti-Papal leaflets at Catholic meetings, and the pioneers of freethought" who hoped to lead the people in new paths are in many places reduced to combating "the growing dangers of clericalism." "We have gained nothing," they cry, "in chasing the Germans, as long as Czech professors bear the canopy over the head of a Prague Archbishop in an idolatrous procession." In Schonau 10,000 men participated in the Catholic day parade! and several meetings were held at the same time. A similar success was achieved in Plau, where Mgr. Kordac, as eloquent as he is energetic, after a moving sermon in church, gave three separate addresses to groups of the crowd outside. His Grace was acclaimed with enthusiasm wherever he passed. His stirring pastoral had laid bare sometime previously the evils of the day: unlawful seizure of churches by the new sects; obstruction to bishops in their duty of confirming the faithful; unscrupulous propaganda by the Y.M.C.A.; anarchy that discredits the new republic; estrangement of the Godfearing Slovaks; corruption of youth by the cinema and shameless books; terrorism by a fanatic anti-religious minority over the truly religious, peace-loving, cultured Czech people.

To the great relief of the law-abiding community the Government has of late withdrawn its support from some turbulent factors it had at first not only countenanced but encouraged. The ring-leaders of the schism, Zahradnik and Farsky, have been dismissed from the high posts they occupied. No Government can long tolerate subversive elements, foes of accepted social codes and traditional moral standards such as the Czech innovators of a "National Church" have proved themselves to be. The revulsion of feeling is strengthened by the acts of the "reformers" who, in their efforts to discredit the clergy faithful to Rome, overleaped the mark. A campaign of calumny against all priests, not sparing, alas! the worthiest among the dead, was supposed to minimise their own shortcomings. "Not we alone," said the apostates, "but many others infringed tho canons." And the fact that fallen priests maligned the priesthood, seeking to discredit the order to which they still affect to belong, filled impartial minds with disgust and dismay. These defamers were at one with atheists and blasphemers in attacking the Catholic clergy. Father Toman, in stern, telling words, exposed the disgraceful machination, and vindicated with righteous indignation the memories of exemplary pastors thus basely calumniated. While money is - forthcoming, however, to subsidise these wanton attacks they are bound to continue. The fiercest among the various sects into which the original schism is breaking up are financed by the Y.M.C.A. of America, ever intent on abetting rebels against Rome. But American Protestants of all shades of belief are over-running the country. A Methodist who held meetings in a tent was first successful in drawing crowds; for a tent, to the unsophisticated Czechs, meant a

circus. There, was a fight for the free seats until the real meaning of the performance became known, when the audience withdrew finding it too tame.

After the magnificent ..Catholic days of the Czechs the Germans of Czecho-Slovakia organised similar demonstrations of faith. Thousands assembled at Arnau and Mariaschein to testify their allegiance to the Church. Bishop Gross, Senator Ledebour, Professor Mayr-Harting and the Deputy Dr. - Feierfeil made notable speeches calling on all true men to work for the unity and solidarity of the Catholic body. Plans were drawn up for combination in sodalities, press ' activity, and all Catholic enterprise.

Dioceses Churches taken from Catholics,. Apos- Laitate cizecl Priests. Priests. Lai- Lay cized AposPriests. tates. Lay Apostates. Prague 8 29 17 23,000 Leitmeritz 8 JO 20 10,000 Konigratz 12 11 31 4,000 Budweis 4 4 30 1,600 Olmutz 4 7 7 10,000 Brunn n 0 3 100 Pressburg 3? 9 P ? Total ... 36 61 118 48,600

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19210915.2.14

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Tablet, 15 September 1921, Page 11

Word Count
2,110

The Bohemian Schism New Zealand Tablet, 15 September 1921, Page 11

The Bohemian Schism New Zealand Tablet, 15 September 1921, Page 11