Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONSTANTINE’S DEVOTION TO THE CROSS

When Christianity was little more than 300 years old (says the Sacred H edrt Review the history of Constantine the Great was written by Eusebius Pamplains, Bishop of Caesarea in Palestine. An extensive literature on Constantine has grown largely from this ancient work. We have at hand a volume published TL London in 1637. It contains a translation of Eusebius, His Life of Constantine, in Four Books.’ The motto below the title is significant: 'Wisdom is most commonly found in him that is good and virtuous.’ The translation was made by one Wye Saltonstall, an Oxford scholar and a Protestant, who tells us—in quaint phrasing and seventeenth century spellingwhy we should know the history of Constantine. He was a scholasticke emperor that loved the clergy and scholars; which made the Bishop Eusebius thus requite his prince by writing his history. And therefore all those whom virtue and learning have advauced to temporal or spiritual dignities, will not think it below them to patronise the history of the Emperor Constantine who advanced both the temporal and spiritual affairs of the world, and was commended by a whole synod to be Pater Patriae, the father of the Empire.

_ It is a duty incumbent on the Catholic reader to review the story of Constantine, in this year of special commemoration in Rome of his victory won through the Cross, and of the promulgation of the Edict of Milan. 'I will only make a plain and perspicuous narrative of Constantine’s actions,’ wrote Eusebius. The relation of his famous and worthy achievements will be pleasant and delightful to the well-disposed reader. . . And thus we will begin this history from the Emperor’s childhood.’

Constantine’s Strength and Courage. The account of the childhood of Constantine is meagre. He was the son of Constantins Chlorus and Helen, and the old chronicle relates that he was a hostage in ‘tyrants’ houses.’ Though he conversed with wicked men he was not infected with their evil manners. While he was still of tender age— ‘ before the first hair appeared on his smooth chin, to change his sweet aspect into a more manly countenance ’ Constantine displayed such strength and courage that they who reigned at the time began to fear and envy him, which the young man observing, he fled away secretly, seeking the house of his father who, shortly ‘ departed out of this life, and left his eldest son to succeed him.’

And so Constantine came to rule over his people, administering his affairs so wisely and well that he was soon enabled to turn his thoughts to other issues. ‘He resolved to aid and help the distressed parts of the world,’ says Eusebius,

• , • • and beholding that /city which represents the world, being the empress and queen of the Roman Empire, held in subjection by tyrants, he said he should take no joy in his life if he should suffer the queen of cities to be thus grievously afflicted, and therefore he provided himself of strength and forces to suppress and extinguish their tyranny.

Vision of the Cross.

Now approaches the turn in the tide of Constantine’s affairs which affected the destinies of nations—when his soul opened to the truth that the victory he hoped for must be won under the banner of Christ, in the Sign of the Cross. Pie earnestly prayed unto God, and besought Him, that He would reveal Himself unto him, and that He would assist him in his purposes and resolutions. The Emperor’s prayer was heard, and a sign given to him. The narrative tells us:—. v . . as he was praying about noon-tide a divine and wonderful vision appeared unto him, which were scarce credible, if himself had not related it. But seeing this victorious emperor did, with an oath, confirm it to be true, when he related unto me who intend to write his history, long after when taking notice of me, he admitted me to have familiar conference with him; who can doubt of the truth of his relation, which afterwards in process of time was confirmed in a miraculous ' manner ? When the sun was gotten to his meridian height, so that it was a little past noon-tide, he said that he beheld the sign of a cross lively figured in the air or sky, with an inscription in it containing these words: In hoc vince. By this conquer. And that he himself and his whole army which marched with him did wonder at so strange a prodigy. Much troubled in mind to know the meaning of the vision the emperor thought and studied till night came on, and in his sleep Christ appeared unto him with the former sign of the cross and commanded him that he should make the like figure and that he should wear it in his banner when he joined battle with his enemies. The chronicle continues: As soon as it grew day, he rose up, and acquainted his friends with the vision which he had seen, and then sending for the best goldsmiths and lapidaries, sitting on his royal throne, he described unto them the shape and figure of the cross, and commanded them to make the like with gold and precious stones,, which figure we chanced to behold. For the emperor himself vouchsafed to show it unto us. With minute detail, Eusebius describes the Labarum : -Description of the Labarum. The figure of the cross was in this manner. The staff was straight, long, and inlaid with gold; the cross-bar was figured in the form of a cross, on the top whereof was a golden crown beset with precious stones. In which was our Saviour’s name inscribed and expressed in two letters (PX) which did perspicuously express the name of Christ (in the Greek form). Which letters the emperor did afterwards us© to carry in his helmet. At one of the corners of the cross-bar hung a thin banner of lawn, curiously embroidered with gold and precious stones, in a strange and admirable manner; this banner, fastened to the pendant, was' as long and broad as the cross. The stem or staff was longer than the colors or banner, and under the cross at the side or border of the banner, there were the pictures of the emperor and his children drawn to the middle or breast high. So that the emperor used this salutary badge as a defensive or divine charm against his enemies. And he commanded that his army should carry and bear the like cross in their colors. Yet another step towards acquiring the knowledge of the Christian religion was taken by Constantine. He sent ‘ for divers priests and religious men ’ to instruct him and to interpret the meaning of the vision of the sacred sign. They answered him that the Christ he had seen in his vision was the only begotten Son of God; and that the sign of the cross which appeared unto him, was a token and trophy of the immortality and victory

which He gained over death. Comparing his vision with the priests’ interpretations Constantine was persuaded that it was a divine revelation, and he therefore resolved to seek divine knowledge, and worship one God only The Cross the Symbol of Victory. ' And now the cross becomes the emperor’s symbol of victory, the sacred sign in which alone man must triumph. Under its protection the emperor went forth to conquer the tyrant Maxentius: And making God his defender and Christ his helper, he prayed unto them for their assistance, and so marched forward with his army, bearing the sign of the cross in his colors, intending to regain unto the Romans their ancient liberty. But Maxentius, trusting more to his than to the good will of his subjects, durst not sally out of the gates of the city, and had fortified all his cities and territories with garrisons of soldiers and military legions. The Emperor Constantine, trusting only in God, set upon the tyrant’s first, second, and third armies, and having overthrown them at the first encounter, he marched up through all Italy, and at last brought his victorious army to the walls of Rome.

The Battle of Milvian Bridge.

Eusebius gives us a graphic account of the final scene in the downfall of the tyrant Maxentius, at the Milvian Bridge: Lest while he (Constantine) besieged the tyrant, he should besiege the Romans also, God, as it were with certain links of Divine Providence, drew forth the tyrant without the walls of the city, and confirmed His former wonderful works. . . For as in the days of Moses, He overthrew Pharaoh and his host, and drowned him and his bands of chosen horsemen in the Red Sea, so both Maxentius and his chief soldiery fell headlong into the Tiber. For when the tyrant fled from Constantine, and thought to have passed over the river on an artificial bridge made of boats, and built to betray Constantine, God turned the plot by a sudden catastrophe, for Maxentius and his army took the bridge, and presently it fell asunder and straightway the men and boats sank down into the sea, he himself fell, and all his chiefs afterwards plunged like stones into the water, to find out an untimely death

jin that element, so that Constantine and his army, having by God’s assistance gained the victory, sang a paean of joy.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19130605.2.23

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Tablet, 5 June 1913, Page 17

Word Count
1,562

CONSTANTINE’S DEVOTION TO THE CROSS New Zealand Tablet, 5 June 1913, Page 17

CONSTANTINE’S DEVOTION TO THE CROSS New Zealand Tablet, 5 June 1913, Page 17